Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Engineering Technology, 2020, 2(1); doi: 10.25236/IJFET.2020.020101.

Research on the Value-added Ability of PV / Energy Storage / Charging Station Value Chain Based on System Dynamics

Author(s)

Qiongjie Dai1,2,3, Jicheng Liu1,3,*

Corresponding Author:
Jicheng Liu
Affiliation(s)

1. School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Changping, Beijing, China, 102206; [email protected]
2. School of Mathematics and Computer Engineering, Ordos Institute of Technology, Ordos, Inner Mongolia, China, 017000;
3. Beijing Key Laboratory of New Energy and Low-Carbon Development (North China Electric Power University), Changping, Beijing, China, 102206
*Correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

Value-added ability is the core competitiveness of enterprises on PV / energy storage / charging station value chain (PEVC), and a key to enhance competitive advantage. Based on in-depth analysis of factors affecting the value-added ability of PEVC, this paper builds a system dynamics model of the value-added ability of PEVC, simulates the value-added ability of PEVC, and a path to improve the value-added ability of PEVC through sensitivity analysis of influencing factors is found, which provides a reference for the development of the photovoltaic- energy storage-charging station.

Keywords

Photovoltaic; Energy storage; Charging station; Value Chain; Value-added ability; System Dynamics

Cite This Paper

Qiongjie Dai, Jicheng Liu. Research on the Value-added Ability of PV / Energy Storage / Charging Station Value Chain Based on System Dynamics. International Journal of Frontiers in Engineering Technology (2020), Vol. 2, Issue 1: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFET.2020.020101.

References

[1] A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, E. Rhodes(1978). Measuring  the  efficiency  of  decision  making  units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research , vol.2, no.6, p. 429-444.
[2] R. Fare, S. Grosskopf(2000). Network DEA [J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol.34, p.35-49.
[3] C. Kao, S.N. Hwang (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data development analysis : an application to non-life insurance ompanies in Taiwan[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, no.185, p. 418-429.
[4] M. M. Yu, E. T. Lin (2008).Efficiency and effectiveness in railway performance using a multi-activity network DEA model[J]. Omega, no.36, p. 1005-1017.
[5] C. Kao (2009).Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis : A relational model[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, vol.192, no.3, p. 949-962.
[6]K.H. Chen, J.C. Guan(2011), Network DEA-based efficiency measurement and decomposition for a relational two-stage production system with shared inputs[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice , vol.31, no.07, p. 1211-1221.
[7]R. Ye, J.F. Yang, Y.H. Chang (2012). Efficiency measurement and decomposition of China’s provincial hi-tech industry[J].The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, vol.29, no.07, p. 3-17+91
[8]J.F. Ma, F. He(2014). Two-stage DEA efficiency evaluation of technological innovation with shared inputs and free intermediate outputs[J]. Systems Engineering, no.01, p.1-9.
[9] D. Fan, S. Li(2019). Research on measurement and promotion path of technology innovation efficiency of regional high-tech industry-Based on relational two-stage DEA model with shared inputs [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 28, no.05, p.156-165.
[10] T.T. Jiang, X.G. Wu(2017). Evaluation of the efficiency of collaborative innovation of IUR and analysis of its influencing factors[J]. Statistics & Decision, vol.31, no.14, p.72-75.
[11] J. Chen, Y.J. Yang(2012). Driven mechanism of collaborative innovation[J]. Technology Economics, vol.31, no.08, p.11-25.
[12] S.L. Sun, C. Peng(2017).The performance evaluation index system research of IUR collaborative innovation project[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, vol.37, no.04, p.89-95.
[13] M. Zhang, L.R. Jian(2017). Research on the innovation cluster network of strategic emerging industry based on cross-organizational knowledge integration[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, vol.37, no.10, p.206-213.