Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2024, 7(1); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2024.070118.

A Comparative Study on the Use of Modal Adjuncts Based on Learners’ Corpus

Author(s)

Song Sixu

Corresponding Author:
Song Sixu
Affiliation(s)

College of Humanities, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876, China

Abstract

Although there have been many relevant studies on modal adjuncts at home and abroad, much remains to be learned about the comparison of modal adjuncts between Chinese learners and native language learners in academic writing texts. The objective of this study is to look at the parallels and variations in the usage of modal adjuncts in academic discourse between Chinese learners and native authors. Based on TECCL and LOCNESS corpora, Lancs Box 6.0 was used for quantitative analysis, and qualitative analysis was carried out in combination with relevant literature. The results show that both Chinese and native learners employ modal adjuncts far more than comment adjuncts. The use of the five sorts of comment adjuncts: “opinion”, “persuasion”, “presumption”, “desirability”, and “validation” differs significantly between Chinese learners and native learners, which can be attributed to the differences in English proficiency and cultural background.

Keywords

modal adjuncts; mood adjuncts; comment adjuncts; interpersonal meaning

Cite This Paper

Song Sixu. A Comparative Study on the Use of Modal Adjuncts Based on Learners’ Corpus. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2024) Vol. 7, Issue 1: 116-122. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2024.070118.

References

[1] Halliday, M.A.K.An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.)[M].London:Edward Arnold, 1994.

[2] Halliday, M.A.K.& Matthiessen,C. M.I.M.An introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.)[M]. London: Edward Arnold,2004.

[3] Jespersen, O. The philosophy of gramma r. [M]. Routledge,2013.

[4] Talmy, L. . Force dynamics in language and cognition[J]. Cognitive science, 1988, 12(1), 49-100.

[5] Sweetser, E.. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1990.

[6] Langacker, R.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar[M]. Stanford: Stanford University,1991.

[7] Lyons, J.Semantics[M]. Cambridge: CUP,1977.

[8] Palmer, F. R. Mood and Modality[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1986.

[9] Aijmer, K. What can a corpus tell you about grammar?[M]. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 1996.

[10] Van Der Auwera, J., & Boye, K. English modality: core, periphery and evidentiality[M]. De Gruyter, 2012.

[11] Kress, G.Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice[M].Oxford: OUP,1985.