The development and cultivation mechanism of College English teachers are very prominent, Under the strategic deployment of the State Council’s request for the transformation of undergraduate universities to application-oriented universities and from the requirement of the Ministry of Education’s speeding up the revitalization, improving the quality of undergraduate education, eliminating “water courses” and creating “MOOCs”. The teaching of College English lexicogrammar has become a major obstacle for College English teachers. The author constructs the teaching model of College English lexicogrammar chunks from three branches of Cognitive Linguistics: Prototype Category Theory, Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Image Schema Theory, and applies the cognitive teaching model to the specific teaching practice of lexicogrammar chunks, so as to promote the development of lexicogrammar chunks teaching ability and practical cultivation mechanism for College English teachers.

Yilong Chen. Research on the Cognitive Teaching Development Ability of Lexico-grammar Chunks MOOCs and Practical Cultivation Mechanism of College English Teachers under the Transformation Background of Newly-rebuilt Universities. International Journal of Frontiers in Engineering Technology (2020), Vol. 2, Issue 1: 50-60. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFET.2020.020105.

[1] Azar, B. Fundamental English Grammar. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education, 2003.
[2] Beycioglu， K.，Ozer，N. & Ugurlu，C. T. (2010). Teachers' views on educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education，26: 1088-1093.
[3] Brindley, G. Classroom-based assessment. In D. Nuan(ed.) Practical English Language Teaching. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2003.
[4] Brown H.D. (Third Edition). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2000. 
[5] Butt, D, Fahey, R, Feez, S, Spinks, S. and Yallop, C. Using Functional Grammar: An Explorer’s Guide. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, 2000.
[6] Carter, R., Hughes, R. and McCarthy, M. Exploring Grammar in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000.
[7] Croft William, Cruse, Alan D. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004.
[8] Douglas Brown Teaching by Principles. An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, 2003.
[9] David Nunan. Practical English Language Teaching: Grammar. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007, 1.
[10] Fragiadakis, Rosenfield, H.K.E. and Graham C. Grammar Step-by-Step 1. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill ESL/ELT, 2004.
[11] Hewings, M. Advanced Grammar in Use: A self-study reference and practice book for advanced learners of English. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000.
[12] Jack C. Richards, Theodore S. Rodgers. Approacher and Methods in Language Teaching. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Cambridge UP, 2008, 8.
[13] Langacker Ronald W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I, II. Standford: Standford UP, 1987.
---. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1987.
[14] Larsen- Freeman, D. Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston, MA: Heinle&Heinle, 2003.
Linse, C. T. and Edwards, B. The New Grammar in Action Assessment. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle, 2001.
[15] Knapp，M. (2003). Professional development as a policy pathway. Review of Research in Education，27: 109-157.
[16] Murphy, R. Grammar in Use: A self-study reference and practice book for intermediate students. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000.
[17] Richards，J. C. & Farrell，T.C. (2005). Professional Development for Language Teachers—Strategies for Teacher Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press
[18] Parrott, M. Grammar for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000.
[19] Penny, UR. A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Cambridge UP, 2000, 8.
[20] Stern, H.H. Issues and Options in Language Teaching. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Education, 1999,4.