Accelerating the implementation of the Free Trade Zone (FTZ) strategy is a crucial element of China's latest phase of opening up to the world. With FTZs present in 70% of Chinese provinces, it can be said that China's economic development has entered an era driven by these zones. Faced with the dual pressures of economic growth and environmental challenges, balancing the relationship between economic development and environmental protection has become a pressing issue.This article asserts that there is substantial resistance and limited avenues for public engagement in environmental protection in China. To address this, it is suggested that legislative measures should affirm and judicial mechanisms should safeguard the public's right to participate. This would expand the channels through which the public can engage in environmental governance. Simultaneously, it is imperative to awaken a sense of agency within the public, enabling them to play a more substantial role in environmental conservation.

Zixi Yang, Zhenzhen Liu. Predicament and Breakthroughs: Analysis on the Chinese Public Participation in Environmental Protection in the Era of Free Trade Zones. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2024) Vol. 7, Issue 2: 7-14. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2024.070202.

[1] Zhuo, C.; Mao, Y.; Rong, J. Policy dividend or “policy trap”? Environmental welfare of establishing free trade zone in China[J]. Sci. Total Environ, 2021, 756: 143856.

[2] Tachie, A.K.et al. The influence of trade openness on environmental pollution in EU-18 countries[J]. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int, 2020, 27, 35535-35555.

[3] He, J. Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: The case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces[J]. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 60: 228-245.

[4] Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Ma, Y. Environmental Effects of Trade Liberalization-Evidence from China’s Pilot Free Trade Zone[J]. J. Int. Commer. Econ. Policy 2021, 12: 2150013.

[5] Law of the People’s Republic of China on Evaluation of Environmental Effects, 2019.

[6] Ma, Yubin, et al. "Research on china's environmental governance mode: quality driven or quantity driven?"[J]. Frontiers in environmental Science, 2022, 10.

[7] Li, Zhengda, et al. What drives green development in china: public pressure or the willingness of local government?[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2021, 29(4): 5454-5468. 

[8] Lu, Haiyan, et al. Shifts in governance modes and explanatory factors in the nimby: findings from the x waste incineration plant in shenzhen, china[J]. environmental Policy and governance, 2022, 33(4): 440-455.

[9] Chen, Haisong, Environmental Rights in the Codification of China’s Environmental Law: Analysis from the Perspective of Research Methodology[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 35(3): 52-59.

[10] Dong, Xiaobo, Jurisprudent Analysis on Fuzziness in Chinese Legislative Languages[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2006: 82-87.

[11] Chen, Jinzhao, How the law adjusts the changing society[J]. Tsinghua University Law Journal, 2018, 12(6): 76-93.

[12] Zhang, Dengwen, The Optimization Path of Administrative Hearing System from the Perspective of Consultative Democracy[J]. Probe, 2016,2: 33-39.

[13] Huang, Wan-Ling, et al. citizen participation in local government decision making[J]. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 2015, 36(2): 188-209.

[14] Du, Hui, On the Transformation of Environmental Governance Models under the Framework of Institutional Logic[J]. Studies in Law and Business, 2013, 1: 69-76.

[15] Chen, Saijin, An Analysis of the New Path of China’s Public Participation in Legislation--from the Perspective of People’s Organizations[J]. Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 49(6): 25-33.

[16] Su, Wunhong, et al. media coverage, environment protection law and environmental research and development: evidence from the chinese-listed firms[J]. Environment Development and Sustainability, 2021, 24(5): 6953-6983.