Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2024, 7(2); doi: 10.25236/FER.2024.070210.

Analysis of Microcourse Resource Development Strategies for Computer Education Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Approach

Author(s)

Qian Chen

Corresponding Author:
Qian Chen
Affiliation(s)

Fuzhou University of International Studies and Trade, Fuzhou, China

Abstract

With the development of education informatization, microteaching resources are more and more widely used in the field of computer education. Cognitive diagnostic methods, as an effective assessment tool, can provide important guidance for the development of microcourse resources, and at the same time, can provide targeted suggestions for the development of microcourse resources by analyzing the cognitive process and thinking mode of students in the learning process. Through the evaluation of the existing microcourse resources, it is found that the existing resources are insufficient in diagnosing the cognitive level of students and cannot accurately understand the knowledge mastery of students. Therefore, this paper will analyze the development strategy of microcourse resources for computer education based on the cognitive diagnosis method. By analyzing the application process and effect of the strategy, this study provides a useful reference for the development of computer education microcourse resources.

Keywords

Cognitive diagnostic methods; computer education; microteaching resource development

Cite This Paper

Qian Chen. Analysis of Microcourse Resource Development Strategies for Computer Education Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Approach. Frontiers in Educational Research (2024) Vol. 7, Issue 2: 62-70. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2024.070210.

References

[1] Azrai, E. P., Rini, D. S., & Suryanda, A. (2020). Micro-teaching in the Digital Industrial Era 4.0: Necessary or not. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4A), 23-30.

[2] Ledger, S., & Fischetti, J. (2020). Micro-teaching 2.0: Technology as the classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 37-54.

[3] Wilson, B. G., & Myers, K. M. (2000). Situated cognition in theoretical and practical context. Theoretical foundations of learning environments, 57-88.

[4] Huong, L. T. T., Thi Thuy Quynh, N., Thi Ngoc, N., & Mau Duc, N. (2021). Applying the Lesson Study Model in Developing Teaching Capability for Young Teachers in Vietnam. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1755-1768.

[5] Yang, Z. (2022). Analysis on the Development Strategy of Computer Education Microcourse Resources Based on a Cognitive Diagnosis Method. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022.

[6] Fitria, T. N. (2022). Microlearning in teaching and learning process: A review. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Bahasa Dan Pendidikan, 2(4), 114-135.

[7] He, L., Sanocki, E., Gupta, A., & Grudin, J. (1999, October). Auto-summarization of audio-video presentations. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM international conference on Multimedia (Part 1) (pp. 489-498).

[8] Khan, S. N. (2015). Microteaching in Pakistan: Perspectives of Novice Higher Education Faculty about the Contribution of Microteaching to their Learning and Practice, University of Massachusetts Amherst.

[9] Onwuagboke, B. B. C., Osuala, R. C., & Nzeako, R. C. (2017). The impact of microteaching in developing teaching skills among pre-service teachers in Alvan Ikoku College of Education Owerri, Nigeria. African Research Review, 11(2), 237-250.

[10] Kurt, G. (2016). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) development of preservice middle school mathematics teachers in statistics teaching: A microteaching lesson study.

[11] Darling-Hammond, L., Hammerness, K., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do, 1, 390-441.

[12] Perlberg, A. (1972). Microteaching. International Review of Education, 547-560.

[13] Lim, C. P., & Chan, B. C. (2007). MicroLESSONS in teacher education: Examining pre-service teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. Computers & Education, 48(3), 474-494.

[14] Pozzi, F., Manca, S., Persico, D., & Sarti, L. (2007). A general framework for tracking and analysing learning processes in computer‐supported collaborative learning environments. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(2), 169-179.

[15] Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, K. (2008). Research on teacher education: Changing times, changing paradigms. In Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 1050-1093). Routledge.