Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2024, 7(7); doi: 10.25236/FER.2024.070707.

An investigation into the current status of information technology teachers' efficacy in teaching computational thinking

Author(s)

Baitong Zhu

Corresponding Author:
Baitong Zhu
Affiliation(s)

Educational Management, Philippine Women's University, Manila, Philippines

Abstract

In the 21st century, as the importance of computational thinking is increasingly emphasized, information technology (IT) teachers have gradually assumed the important responsibility of cultivating students' computational thinking, and how to effectively improve students' computational thinking has become the focus and difficulty of the IT curriculum. In order to improve students' computational thinking, teachers as instructors need to be equipped with high computational thinking ability and strong sense of teaching efficacy. It is thus necessary to pay attention to how to improve teachers' computational thinking ability and teaching efficacy. However, relevant literature on the research status of teachers' computational thinking teaching efficacy is currently very limited. Most of the literature research mainly focuses on the cultivation of computational thinking of college students, primary and secondary school students as well as high school and vocational students, while the literature on how to improve the computational thinking teaching efficacy of information technology teachers is very scarce, and in-depth systematic research and practice in this area has not yet started. In this paper, the concepts of computational thinking and computational thinking teaching efficacy are first interpreted by combing relevant journals, and certain articles are organized that can represent the current status of computational thinking and teaching efficacy of IT teachers. Further, this paper gains insight into analyses of scholars on the level of computational thinking teaching efficacy of IT teachers in various dimensions. Finally, corresponding strategies are proposed to improve the computational thinking teaching efficacy of teachers in the light of the current situation, hoping to contribute to the enhancement of the effectiveness of IT teachers worldwide.

Keywords

Computational Thinking, Instructional Efficacy, Information Technology Teachers

Cite This Paper

Baitong Zhu. An investigation into the current status of information technology teachers' efficacy in teaching computational thinking. Frontiers in Educational Research (2024) Vol. 7, Issue 7: 45-51. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2024.070707.

References

[1] Qualls J A , Sherrell L, B . Why computational thinking should be integrated into the curriculum[J]. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 2010, 25(5):66-71.

[2] Zhang L C, Nouri J. A systematic review of learning by computational thinking through Scratch inK-9[J]. Computers & Education, 2019: 103607.

[3] CSTA.CSTA'sK-12Standards[EB/OL]. https://www.csteachers.org/page/about-csta -s-k-12-nbsp- standards

[4] ISTE.Computational Thinking Competencies for Educators [EB/OL].https: //www.csteachers.org/ page/about-csta-s-k-12-nbsp-standards

[5] National Research Council. Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking [M]. National Academies Press, 2010.

[6] Seymour Papert.Mindstorms:Children, Computers, and Powerful IdeasM.NewYork:Basic Books, 1980:285-286.

[7] Jeannette. MComputational Thinking[J]. .Communications of the AC, 2006(3):33-35.

[8] Wing J M. Research Notebook: Computational Thinking What and Why? In the Magazine of the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science,2011 .

[9] Bandura A. Self-efficacy [J]. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 2010: 1-3.

[10] Yuting Cui. The effects of achievement motivation and self-efficacy on teachers' knowledge domain acquisition in primary and secondary schools [D]. Wuhan:Huazhong Normal University,2019.

[11] Soodak L, C, Podell D M. Teacher efficacy: towards the understanding of a multi-facetedconstruct [J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1996, 12(4): 401-411.

[12] Weese J L, Feldhausen R. STEM outreach: assessing computational thinking and problem solving[C]. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Conference Proceedings. 2017.

[13] Peng Jianrui. A study on the current status of computational thinking teaching efficacy among pre-service teachers of information technology[D]. Shenyang Normal University, 2023. DOI: 10.27328/d.cnki.gshsc.2023.000093. 

[14] Bers U, Flannery L, Kazakoff E R, et al. Computational thinking and tinkering: explorationof an early childhood robotics curriculum[J]. Computers & amp; Education, 2014, 72: 145-157.

[15] Durak H Y, Saritepeci M, Analysis of the relation between computational thinking skillsand various variables with the structural equation model[J]. Computers & Education, 2018, 116: 191-202.

[16] Feng X, Lu Ruoyu, Peng Lei. A study on the relationship between personal innovation behavior and work motivation and self-efficacy of employees in service enterprises[J]. Research and Development Management,2009,21(03):42-49.

[17] Dong Jingjing. Review and Prospect of Foreign Research on Teachers' Self-Efficacy in the New Century [J]. Contemporary Teacher Education,2019,12(3):86.93.

[18] Wang Zhendong, On the teaching efficacy of distance education teachers and its cultivation [J]. China Electronic Education,2006(11):41-44.