Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of New Developments in Education, 2024, 6(7); doi: 10.25236/IJNDE.2024.060703.

Impacts of the Motivations of English Learning on the Psychological Needs under Self-determination Theory

Author(s)

Ye Lisha

Corresponding Author:
Ye Lisha
Affiliation(s)

Wuhan University of Bioengineering, Wuhan, China

Abstract

Autonomous motivation plays a big role in language learning, which makes it a popular and vital direction to explore the measures of taking advantage of intrinsic motivation to achieve better teaching effects in educational research. This paper revolves around the relationship between motivation and self-determination theory regarding psychological needs. By exploiting the related empirical studies into learners studying English as a foreign language, this analytical paper analyses and compares the results of these empirical studies, which reveals that intrinsic motivation performs better than extrinsic motivation on these psychological levels. This paper concludes that intrinsic motivation can generally facilitate stronger autonomous learning, form higher competence, and improve greater relatedness. Therefore, educators should figure out ways to strategically tailor pedagogy to enhance intrinsic motivation and facilitate autonomous learning.

Keywords

Motivation, Language Learning, Autonomous Learning, Self-determination Theory, Psychological Needs

Cite This Paper

Ye Lisha. Impacts of the Motivations of English Learning on the Psychological Needs under Self-determination Theory. International Journal of New Developments in Education (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 7: 12-16. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2024.060703.

References

[1] Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language teaching, 31(3), 117-135.

[2] Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language learning, 53(S1), 3-32.

[3] Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

[4] Dornyei, Z. & Otto, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 4, 43-69.

[5] Benware, C. & Deci, E. (1984). Quality of Learning with an Active versus Passive Motivational Set. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 755-765.

[6] Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: a self-determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi & A. Krapp (Eds.) The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43-70). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

[7] Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271-360.

[8] Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

[9] Zainuddin, Z. & Perera, C. J. (2019). Exploring students’ competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(1), 115-126.

[10] Noels, K. A. (2001). New orientations in language learning motivation: Towards a model of intrinsic, extrinsic, and integrative orientations and motivation. In Z. Dornyei and R. Schmitt (Eds.) Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 43-68). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.

[11] Yu, J. (2020). Existence of Integrated Regulation and Its Implication on Foreign Language Teaching: A Survey Study, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. 14(1), 67-82.

[12] Ning, H & Hornby, G. (2014). The impact of cooperative learning on tertiary EFL learners’ motivation, Educational Review, 66(1), 108-124.

[13] Liang, M. Y. (2010). Using synchronous online peer response groups in EFL writing: Revision-related discourse. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 45-64.