Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Art Research, 2024, 6(8); doi: 10.25236/FAR.2024.060808.

Research on the Protection and Inheritance of the Traditional Handicraft Techniques and Innovative Design under the Vision of Intangible Cultural Heritage—Taking Rongchang Pottery as a Case Study

Author(s)

Hua Guanqing1, Dai Qifu2

Corresponding Author:
Hua Guanqing
Affiliation(s)

1School of Arts, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

2Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

Abstract

Intangible cultural heritage(ICH) is not only the crystallization of civilization and the wisdom of the Chinese nation, but it also the precious wealth shared by all mankind. With the development of Chinese excellent traditional culture inheritance of project implementation, to excavate and sort, as well as to inherit and protect the ICH is a common academic topic, but, based on the vision of ICH, and around the traditional making skill’s creative transformation and innovative development research is relatively few and lack of research on the key force of creative design driving the protection and inheritance of ICH .This paper ,taking Chongqing Rongchang Pottery as a case study,  focus on the pottery making skills and  the craft inheritance and creative development. The author points out that the protection and inheritance of ICH is not only focus on multimodal interaction among people, things and the spatial-temporal landscape, but also to focus on the creative design and the power of science and technology. To explore the connection point of traditional culture and modern life, it will promote the preservation, inheritance, creative transformation and innovative development of ICH in an all-round way.

Keywords

Rongchang pottery, intangible cultural heritage, protection and inheritance, creative design

Cite This Paper

Hua Guanqing, Dai Qifu. Research on the Protection and Inheritance of the Traditional Handicraft Techniques and Innovative Design under the Vision of Intangible Cultural Heritage—Taking Rongchang Pottery as a Case Study. Frontiers in Art Research (2024) Vol. 6, Issue 8: 40-45. https://doi.org/10.25236/FAR.2024.060808.

References

[1] Tian Yan(2013). Research on the identification system of representative inheritors of intangible cultural heritage [J]. Political and Legal Forum(04):81-90.

[2] Liu Xiaochun(2012). Some Theoretical and Practical Issues of Intangible Cultural Heritage Inheritors[J]. Thought Front(06):53-60.

[3] Gao Xiaokang(2019). Aesthetics of Intangible cultural heritage: Inheritance, creativity and mutual sharing[J]. Social Science Series (01):177-185+2.

[4] Yu Yue. Ten Years of Review and Rational Thinking on Intangible Cultural Heritage Research[J]. Jiangxi Social Science,2010(09):7-20.

[5] Huang Yonglin, Tan Guoxin(2012). Research on Digital Protection and Development of Intangible Cultural Heritage in China[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)(02):49-55. 

[6] Qi Qingfu(2009). Survival of “living heritage” is the basic criterion for measuring the rationality of intangible cultural heritage protection[J]. Journal of Central South University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)(03):1-4.

[7] Liu Kuili(2020). Retrospection and Reflection on the Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage[J]. China Intangible Cultural Heritage(01):32-40.

[8] Li Jianmei(2016). Research on Cultural Heritage and Tourism Branding under Culture and Tourism Integration [D]. Shandong University.