Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2024, 7(9); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2024.070905.
Chu Lixin
School of International Studies, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Since India’s independence, the relationship between politics and business has undergone a complex evolution, resulting in a unique Indian model that profoundly impacts the country’s economic development and political landscape. This study investigates the dynamics of this relationship under Modi’s administration using the concept of structural power as a theoretical foundation. The research reveals that politics and business are interdependent, creating blurred boundaries of interest exchange. Indian business groups actively engage in politics through political donations, networking with political elites, and influencing administrative bodies. Concurrently, Indian politicians are increasingly involved in commercial activities. Business associations act as intermediaries, facilitating collective action and providing policy recommendations to the government. The primary factors shaping the Indian political-business relationship are its distinctive democratic political system, the growing structural power of business, and the pursuit of national development goals.
India; Political-Business Relations; Business Associations; Structural Power
Chu Lixin. Analysis of the Mechanisms of Political-Business Relations in India under Modi’s Leadership. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2024) Vol. 7, Issue 9: 22-30. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2024.070905.
[1] Lindblom and Edward, C.(1977). The Worlds Political Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.
[2] Fairfield.(2015). Structural Power in Comparative Political Economy: Perspectives from Policy Formulation in Latin America. Business and Politics, (03),411-441.
[3] Aseema Sinha(2019). Economic Liberalization and the structural power of business. Business and politics in India. New York: Oxford University.
[4] Rahman, Shaffi.(2009). Business of the Day. India Today.
[5] Bikash.(2014). BJP bagged over 70% of total electoral donation. Times.
[6] Netty Ismail and Pooja Thakur.(2014). Mukesh Ambani Leads Billionaire Gains on Narenclra Modi’s Lead. Mint.
[7] Fang Haowei.(2009). Administrative Reforms of the Modi Government in India since 2014. Studies in Indian Ocean Economies, (01),135-152.
[8] Loksabha.(2024 ). List of Members. https://loksabha.nic.in/
[9] Rajyasabha.(2024 ). List of Members. https://rajyasabha.nic.in/
[10] Malik, Aman.(2014). The Business Interests of Nitin Gadkari. LiveMint.
[11] Adil.(2015, March 25). Network 18 ropes in Nirupama Rao as independent director. The Economic Times.
[12] Baldev(2024). Bimal Jalan Biography. The India Express.
[13] Saumya Khandelwal. (2019). India’s former finance minister Arun Jaitley dies aged 66. The Guardian.
[14] Asseema Sinha.(2005). Understanding the Rise and Transformation of Business Collective Action in India. Business and Politics, 7(02),24-29.
[15] Kohli Atul.(2012). Poverty amid Plenty in the New India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[16] Vaishnav., Swanson R. and Milan.(2015). Does Good Economics Make for Good Politics? Evidence from Indian States. India Review, 14(03), 279-311.
[17] Lin Chengjie.(2003). History of Political, Economic and Social Development of India after Independence. Beijing: Kunlun Publishing House.
[18] Chloe Taylor.(2023). One of Wall Street’s most feared short-selling research firms just accused Asia’s richest man of a multibillion-dollar fraud. Fortune.
[19] Adani’s $108 Billion Crisis Shakes Investors’ Faith in India.(2023). Bloomberg.
[20] Swastika Mukhopadhyay.(2023). How Adani Group Has Diversified And Expanded Across India. NDTV.