Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2024, 7(9); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2024.070909.
Jiani Tan
Graduate School, Guizhou University of China, Guiyang, 550025, China
The third-party treatment of environmental contamination leads to the separation of polluter and tackle polluter and even forms a complex structure of polluter, indirect tackle polluter and direct tackle polluter. In combination with practice, indirect tackle polluter collected waste given by polluter who made waste and then handed over to the direct tackle polluter for discharge, dumping and disposal of polluting substances. However, the judicial adjudication only punished indirect tackle polluter and direct tackle polluter for the criminal responsibility of environmental contamination. The polluter was not punished. There are mainly reasons for this issue. First, the third-party of environmental contamination has produced a complex structure of polluter, indirect tackle polluter and direct tackle polluter. Second, Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China lacks legal norms for polluter’ supervision. Third, judicial adjudication is also difficult to prove the complex causality between supervisory negligence and environmental contamination. Regarding this issue, based on Objective Imputation Theory, polluter does not carefully perform the supervision obligation of pollutant, increasing in pollution risk, resulting environmental contamination. The negligent crime of polluter’ supervision in the third-party should be punished as the crime of environmental contamination.
Polluter’s Supervision, Negligent Crime, Crime of Environmental Contamination, Objective Imputation Theory
Jiani Tan. Study on Negligent Crime of Polluter’s Supervision in the Third-Party Treatment of Environmental Contamination. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2024) Vol. 7, Issue 9: 50-55. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2024.070909.
[1] Liu Junming, Li Mengjiao. Legal Dilemma of Third-party Environmental Pollution Control and its Solution. Journal of Hebei Law, 2016(4): 39-49.
[2] German Criminal Code.Translated by Xu Jiusheng. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2019: 228.
[3] VgI. Frank SaIiger, UmweItsrafrecht 2. AufI.,München 2020, Rn. 220.
[4] Chang Jingyuan. Environmental Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. Tokyo: Shin-Yama Press, 2019: 66.
[5] Ren zhuoran. On the Criminal Liability of Third-party Environmental Pollution Control. JiangHai Journal, 2022(3): 168-175.
[6] Zhou Guangquan. Pandect of Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2021: 162.
[7] Hong Xilei. Study on Objective Imputation Theory -- Debate between the Theory of Legal Interests and Norms. [Dissertation]. Nanjing Normal University University, 2016.
[8] Qian Ritong. The Principle of Trust in Negligent Crime: from Wrongful Act to Wrongful Result. Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law, 2023(3): 105-117.
[9] Cao fei.The Application of the Principle of Reliance in the Supervision of Negligence. Journal of Guangxi University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2012(4): 60-61.
[10] Ma Yinxiang, Jiang hao. Attribution and Imputation: Analysis of the Judgment Path of Causality of Environmental Pollution Crime. Present Day Law Science, 2021, 19(6): 73-85.