Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Medical Science Research, 2020, 2(1); doi: 10.25236/FMSR.2020.020106.

Study on Screening Methods for Glaucoma in Physical Examination Population

Author(s)

Peiping Wang, Chuna Zheng*, Changmin Ke

Corresponding Author:
Chuna Zheng
Affiliation(s)

The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China
*Corresponding Author

Abstract

Objective: to analyze the incidence of glaucoma in the physical population and the necessity of glaucoma screening. Methods: the subjects were selected from 300 subjects who underwent physical examination in ophthalmology department of our hospital from January 2018 to December 2018, and the subjects underwent eye examination, including medical history inquiry, visual examination, general eye examination, intraocular pressure examination, eye eye examination, etc. If the physical examination is suspected of glaucoma or fundus lesions, 24h of intraocular pressure monitoring and anterior chamber Angle microscopy should be performed. Results: the study results showed that there were 6 patients with glaucoma, and the overall prevalence rate was 5.0%, and the age group with the highest proportion of patients was over 70 years old. With the increase of age, the prevalence rate increased gradually, which was also consistent with the epidemiological survey results of previous studies on large-scale sample size. Conclusion: glaucoma screening can understand the condition of eye health in modern population, so as to reduce the possibility of visual impairment and irreversible blindness.

Keywords

Physical examination population; Glaucoma; Screening method

Cite This Paper

Peiping Wang, Chuna Zheng, Changmin Ke. Study on Screening Methods for Glaucoma in Physical Examination Population. Frontiers in Medical Science Research (2020) Vol. 2 Issue 1: 47-52. https://doi.org/10.25236/FMSR.2020.020106.

References

[1] Song Yong Ju, Kim Yong Woo, Park Ki Ho, et al (2019). Comparison of glaucoma patients referred by glaucoma screening versus referral from primary eye clinic. PloS one, vol.14, no.1, pp.175-176.
[2] Hark Lisa A, Adeghate Jennifer, Katz L Jay, et al (2019). Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-Up Study: Cataract Classifications Following Eye Screening. Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, pp.212-213.
[3] Hark Lisa A, Myers Jonathan S, Ines Andrew, et al (2019). Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study: confirmation between eye screening and comprehensive eye examination diagnoses. The British journal of ophthalmology, vol.103, no.12, pp.178-179.
[4] He Jing Na, Lu Shiyao, Chen Li Jia (2019). Coding Region Mutation Screening in Optineurin in Chinese Normal-Tension Glaucoma Patients. Disease markers, pp.321-222.
[5] Zhang Shaodan, Sun Jing, Liu Shanshan, et al (2019). Integrating opportunistic glaucoma screening into general health examinations in China: A pilot study. Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, vol.47, no.8, pp.156-157.