This study investigates the difficulties encountered by Korean EFL learners with different proficiency levels in listening comprehension. It identifies significant barriers faced by low-proficiency students, particularly in the perception stage with fast speech rates, accent variations, as well as speech ambiguity. While all the participants struggle with the parsing stage, low-proficiency students exhibit more pronounced issues in information processing and memory. High-proficiency students face fewer challenges in perception but still have difficulties at the parsing stage. The findings highlight the parsing stage as the most challenging process for Korean EFL learners. Based on the findings of the research, some implications are made in the conclusion. Recommendations include enhanced perception stage training, tailored listening activities, and targeted parsing stage practice. Following the current research, a future study examining additional influencing factors, and exploring technology-assisted and multimodal teaching methods aimed at helping Korean EFL learners overcome difficulties in the listening process awaits.

Yumeng Sun. An Analysis of Listening Comprehension Difficulties among Korean EFL Learners---A Case Study. International Journal of New Developments in Education (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 9: 88-95. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2024.060913.

[1] Anderson, J. R. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications [M]. Macmillan, 2015, 313-337.

[2] Bacon, S. M. Phases of Listening to Authentic Input in Spanish: A Descriptive Study [J]. Foreign Language Annals, 1992, 25(4), 317-333.

[3] Cao, F. F. Analysis of Second Language Listening Difficulties of Non-English Majors in Higher Vocational University [J]. Journal of Harbin Vocational & Technical College, 2018, 142 (6), 147-150.

[4] Goh, C. C. A Cognitive Perspective on Language Learners’ Listening Comprehension Problems [J]. System, 2000, 28(1), 55-75.

[5] Wang, Y. An Analysis of Second Language Students’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties Based on Cognitive Framework [J]. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 2008, 121(1), 53-58.

[6] Hu, X. Y. Survey and Cognitive Analysis of Second Language Listening Comprehension Problems [J]. Journal of Yunmeng, 2009, 30(1), 142-145.

[7] Hamad Al-khresheh, M. The Impact of Cultural Background on Listening Comprehension of Saudi EFL Students [J]. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 2020, 11(3), 349-371.

[8] Jeon, Jihyun. Factors Affecting L2 Learners’ Listening Comprehension and Their Listening Difficulty-Overcoming Strategies [J]. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2010, 26(4), 81-119.

[9] Lee, Shinsook. Korean University Students’ Listening Comprehension and Learning Effects of Connected Speech Processes in English [J]. Applied Linguistics, 2013, 29(3), 133-169.

[10] Nowrouzi, S., Tam, S. S., Zareian, G., & Nimehchisalem, V. Iranian EFL Students’ Listening Comprehension Problems [J]. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2015, 5(2), 263-269.

[11] Sadatmir, S., Nimehchisalem, V., & Abdullah, A. N.  Validation of ‘Self-Perception of ESL Learners’ Listening Comprehension Problems and Metacognitive Listening Strategy Use Questionnaire [J]. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 2018, 9(6), 158-171.

[12] Zhang, Z. H., L, L., & T, X. Cognitive Analysis of Relationships between Language Proficiency and Listening Comprehension Problems [J]. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice. 2010, 129(1) 33-38.

[13] Tran, T. Q., & Duong, T. M. Insights into Listening Comprehension Problems: A Case Study in Vietnam [J]. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 2020, 59, 77-100.

[14] Vandergrift, L. Second Language Listening: Presage, Process, Product, and Pedagogy[M]. In Hinkel E, (Ed.) Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, Routledge, London.2011, 2: 455-471.

[15] Zsoldos, L. G. A Study of Listening Discrimination in Korean University Students [J]. Middle East Journal of TEFL, 2022, 2(2), 44-59.