This paper explores the transition of English from a synthetic language to an analytic language from the perspective of language economics. It examines the economic factors that have influenced this transition, including trade and commerce, education and literacy, and globalization and international communication. These factors have shaped the structural changes in English and have made it more accessible and easier to learn for language learners. The paper also discusses the linguistic and sociocultural implications of this transition. The shift in grammar and syntax has had profound effects on language acquisition and language learning, with a greater emphasis on communication skills rather than grammatical accuracy. Furthermore, the dominance of English as a global language has led to power imbalances, cultural assimilation, and debates about linguistic imperialism. Understanding the transition of English from a synthetic to an analytic language holds immense significance. It provides insights into the mechanisms of language change and the factors that drive such transformations. Moreover, studying this transition from the perspective of language economics sheds light on the economic advantages and implications of language change. This study contributes to linguistic research, language policy, and our understanding of the role of English as a global language. It highlights the complex relationship between language, society, and economics.

Ding Yutong. A Study on the Trend of English Changing from Synthetic Language to Analytic Language from the Perspective of Language Economics. Frontiers in Educational Research (2024) Vol. 7, Issue 10: 147-152. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2024.071024.

[1] Steels, L. Human language is a culturally evolving system [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2017, 24: 190–193.

[2] Mufwene, Salikoko S. The origins and evolution of language [C]. In K. Alan (Ed.), Handbook of the History of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013: 13-52.

[3] Bickel, B. & Nichols, J. Inflectional morphology [C]. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 169-240.

[4] Simpson, D. P. Cassell's Latin Dictionary [M]. New York & London: Funk & Wagnalls Company, 1959.

[5] Muller, V. K. English-Russian dictionary [M]. Moscow: Russian Language Publishers, 1982.

[6] Cardona, G. Sanskrit language. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica. com/topic/Sanskrit-language, 2023.

[7] Subbarao, K. V. Typological characteristics of South Asian languages [C]. In B.B. Kachru, Y. Kachru,& S.N. Sridhar (Eds.), Language in South Asia, 2008: 49-78.

[8] TiengAnhAZ. Topic 41: Trái Cây và Rau Củ (Fruits and Vegetables). https://tienganhaz. com/topic-41-trai-cay-va-rau-cu-fruits-and-vegetables/, 2019.

[9] Zheng, L. P. The definition dispute of linguistic economics [J]. Chinese language construction, 2015(14): 74-75.

[10] Liu, G. H., & Zhang, W. G. The Methods and Practical Paths of Language Economics Research [J]. Applied Linguistics, 2021(03): 41-49.

[11] Zhao, X. F. A Brief Discussion on the Trend of English Refractive Language Transitioning to Isolated Language [J]. Campus English, 2022(40): 187-189.

[12] Chen, W. K. Language Life and Language Services from the Perspective of Language Economics [J]. Henan Social Sciences, 2013(09): 80-83.

[13] Liu, Y. Q. On the transformation of Australia from a monolingual society to a multilingual society [J]. Journal of Henan University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2004(04): 62-65.

[14] Zhao, S. J., & Ge, X. Y. Dimensions and Perspectives of Language Economics [J]. Journal of Wuhan University (Humanities Edition), 2017(06): 92-104.

[15] Zhao, J. Research on Business Negotiation Discourse from the Perspective of Linguistic Economics [J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Teacher Development College, 2022(03): 133-135.

[16] Li, Z. G. A Study on the Language Types of English's Evolution from Refractive Language to Isolated Language (Master's thesis, Hunan University of Technology), 2011.

[17] Lu, J. The evolution of modern English from inflectional to isolating language based on the American Contemporary English [J]. Journal of Hubei University of Economics (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2016(03): 135-136.

[18] Cai, D. S. Principles of Language Economy and Translation Strategies for International Business Letters [J]. Study of Science and Engineering at RTVU, 2018(01): 49-51+57.

[19] Liu, Y. L. The Development and Changes of Modern German Chinese Language from the Perspective of Language Economy [J]. Foreign Language Education, 2008(02): 12-15.

[20] Jiang, H. European linguistic hegemony is the soul of postcolonial theory - A brief review of "Reverse Writing Empire: Theory and Practice of postcolonial Literature" [J]. Literary Theory and Criticism, 2016(01): 75-80.