Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Art Research, 2025, 7(3); doi: 10.25236/FAR.2025.070310.

Analysis of the relationship between works and artworks: a case study of traditional Chinese painting

Author(s)

Zhu Yingli1, Zhao Yexuan2

Corresponding Author:
Zhu Yingli
Affiliation(s)

1School of Art and Design, Yunnan University, Yunnan, Kunming, 650091, China

2School of Architecture and Planning, Yunnan University, Yunnan, Kunming, 650500, China

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the relationship between works and artworks, using traditional Chinese painting as a case study to delve into their connotations and transformations. By examining the historical background, creative process, aesthetic characteristics, and role in cultural inheritance of traditional Chinese painting. this paper points out that works are the primary form of artworks, while artworks represent the advanced form of works after aesthetic selection, cultural accumulation, and social recognition over time. The study finds that the key to traditional Chinese painting works evolving into artworks lies in their unique artistic value, profound cultural significance, and extensive social influence. This article seeks to provide a new perspective on understanding the relationship between works and artworks and to offer a reevaluation of the artistic value of traditional Chinese painting.

Keywords

work; art; traditional Chinese painting; artistic value; cultural inheritance

Cite This Paper

Zhu Yingli, Zhao Yexuan. Analysis of the relationship between works and artworks: a case study of traditional Chinese painting. Frontiers in Art Research(2025), Vol. 7, Issue 3: 52-57. https://doi.org/10.25236/FAR.2025.070310.

References

[1] Clunas, C. (2013). Chinese art: A history in objects. Thames & Hudson.

[2] Harper, C. (2018). Chinese painting techniques: Mastering traditional styles. Tuttle Publishing.

[3] Barnhart, R. M. (2016). Painters of the Great Ming: The Imperial Court and the Zhe School. Columbia University Press.

[4] Kant, I. (2000). Critique of Judgment. Translated by J. H. Bernard. Prometheus Books.

[5] Greenberg, C. (1993). Art and Culture: Critical Essays. Beacon Press.

[6] Dickie, G. (1974). Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. Cornell University Press.

[7] Beardsley, M. C. (1982). Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. Hackett Publishing Company.

[8] Sullivan, M. (1996). The Arts of China. University of California Press.

[9] Clunas, C. (2013). Chinese Art: A History in Objects. Thames & Hudson.

[10] Wang, H. (2015). The Art of Chinese Painting: Methods and Principles. Shanghai Press.

[11] Shapiro, M. (1999). The Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Bobbs-Merrill.

[12] Barnhart, R. M. (2016). Painters of the Great Ming: The Imperial Court and the Zhe School. Columbia University Press.

[13] Harper, C. (2018). Chinese Painting Techniques: Mastering Traditional Styles. Tuttle Publishing.

[14] Fong, M. (2000). Beyond Representation: Chinese Painting and Calligraphy since 1990. Harry N. Abrams.

[15] Kuo, J. C. (2020). The Cultural Significance of Chinese Painting. University of Hawaii Press.

[16] Shen, G. (2021). Rethinking the Value of Traditional Chinese Painting. Springer.

[17] Chang, C. (2017). The Social Impact of Chinese Art: From Ancient to Contemporary. Routledge.

[18] Li, Z. (2010). A History of Chinese Aesthetics. Brill.

[19] Cahill, J. (2014). The Compelling Image: Nature and Style in Chinese Painting. University of California Press.

[20] Zhu, L. (2018). Fifteen Lectures on Chinese Aesthetics. China Social Sciences Press.

[21] Wu, H. (2015). Uses of Art in Modern China. University of Chicago Press.

[22] Silbergeld, J. (2008). Chinese Painting and Modernity. University of Washington Press.

[23] Smith, J. (2010). The aesthetics of art: An introduction. Oxford University Press.

[24] Eco, U. (1995). The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Indiana University Press.