International Journal of New Developments in Education, 2025, 7(3); doi: 10.25236/IJNDE.2025.070309.
Minjie Wang, Ran Wei
School of Foreign Studies, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China
China’s English Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education (2022) in the section of teaching suggestions proposes that we should promote the integration of teaching, learning and assessment to accelerate the reform of English evaluation system in junior high school. But there are problems of such integration in the practice of English reading lessons in junior high school. This paper explores strategies for integrating these elements through backward design, illustrated by a case study of Unit 8 (Natural Disasters) from the 8A Yi Lin Edition. The findings aim to provide actionable guidance for educators.
Teaching-learning-assessment integration; English reading teaching of junior high school; backward design; case analysis
Minjie Wang, Ran Wei. Integrating Teaching-Learning-Assessment in English Reading Teaching of Chinese Junior High School Based on Backward Design. International Journal of New Developments in Education(2025), Vol. 7, Issue 3: 51-60. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2025.070309.
[1] Ministry of Education. (2018). English curriculum standards for senior high schools (2017 edition). People's Education Press.
[2] Ministry of Education. (2022). English curriculum standards for compulsory education (2022 edition). People's Education Press.
[3] Cheng, X., & Xie, S. (2023). The concept and practice of integrating teaching, learning, and assessment in English education. Foreign Language Teaching in Schools (Middle School Edition), 46(1), 1–8.
[4] Sang, Z., Zou, W., Zeng, W., et al. (2023). Research on the implementation of teaching, learning, and assessment integration based on exploratory practice theory. Frontiers of Foreign Language Education Research, 6(4), 55–63, 95–96.
[5] Liu, X., Chen, C., & Tan, L. (2023). Construction of a high school chemistry unit teaching model integrating teaching, learning, and assessment. Chemical Education (Chinese and English), 44(21), 8–14.
[6] Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
[7] Cui, Y., & Lei, H. (2015). The construction of a three-factor theoretical model for teaching-learning-assessment consistency. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 33(4), 15–22.
[8] Zou, X. (2017). Psychological strategies for cultivating positive emotions in junior high school English reading teaching. Teaching and Management, 34, 43–46.
[9] Ying, Z., & Fu, F. (2023). An initial exploration of multi-skill integrated reading teaching. Foreign Language Teaching in Schools (Middle School Edition), 46(2), 49–54.
[10] Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1999). The understanding by design handbook. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[11] He, Y., & Sheng, Q. (2007). Teaching for understanding: Mastering backward design. Higher Education Management, 2, 21–26.
[12] Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2015). Embedding formative assessment: Practical techniques for K-12 classrooms. Learning Sciences International.
[13] Zhang, J. (2013). A study on the implementation of formative assessment in high school English education in China. Curriculum, Teaching Material, and Method, 33(9), 60–67.
[14] Cai, Z. (2020). On the consistency of teaching, learning, and assessment in Chinese language education from the perspectives of objectives, content, and process. Chinese Language Teaching and Research, 5, 68–71.
[15] Wang, Q., Zhou, M., Jiang, J., et al. (2020). An analysis of English subject instructional design based on big ideas. Curriculum, Teaching Material, and Method, 40(11), 99–108.
[16] Wang, Q., & Li, L. (2019). Promoting the integration of teaching, learning, and assessment in English classrooms under the core competency framework: Significance, theory, and methods. Curriculum, Teaching Material, and Method, 39(5), 114–120.