Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2025, 8(4); doi: 10.25236/FER.2025.080426.

Group Dynamic Assessment in Second Language Writing Teaching: Review and Prospect

Author(s)

Man Yang, Ran Wei

Corresponding Author:
Ran Wei
Affiliation(s)

School of Foreign Studies, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China

Abstract

This article compiles and summarizes the research on dynamic assessment in the field of second language writing teaching at home and abroad. Firstly, it explains the definitions of dynamic assessment and group dynamic assessment. Then, it summarizes and reviews the research on the application of dynamic assessment and group dynamic assessment in the field of second language writing teaching respectively. Finally, it looks forward to the future development trend of relevant research. The findings show that: the research on dynamic assessment and group dynamic assessment in the field of second language teaching abroad has been flourishing, while the research on group dynamic assessment at home started later than that abroad, and the subjects of empirical studies at home and abroad mainly focus on college students, with a lack of research on secondary school students. In the future, the research on the application of group dynamic assessment in second language writing teaching can be developed in the following directions: in-depth exploration of group dynamic assessment, large-scale empirical research, rational use of technological assistance, application of diversified teaching, etc.

Keywords

dynamic assessment; group dynamic assessment; second language writing teaching; research review; research prospect

Cite This Paper

Man Yang, Ran Wei. Group Dynamic Assessment in Second Language Writing Teaching: Review and Prospect. Frontiers in Educational Research (2025), Vol. 8, Issue 4: 178-185. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2025.080426.

References

[1] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

[2] Han, B. C. (2009). Dynamic assessment theory, model and its application in foreign language education. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 41(06): 452-458.

[3] Luria, A. R. (1961). “An objective approach to the study of the abnormal child”. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 31, 1-16.

[4] Tzuriel, D., & Kaufman, R. (1999). Mediated learning and cognitive modifiability: Dynamic assessment of young Ethiopian immigrant children to Israel. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(3), 359-380.

[5] Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Dynamic testing - The nature and measurement of learning potential. Contemporary Psychology Apa Review of Books, 49(1), 91-93.

[6] Lidz, C. S., & Gindis, B. (2003). Vygotsky’s Educational Theory In Cultural Context: Dynamic Assessment Of The Evolving Cognitive Functions In Children. Cambridge University Press.

[7] Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233-265.

[8] Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach To Understanding And Promoting L2 Development. Springer.

[9] Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471-491.

[10] Liu, S., & Wu, Z. M. (2017). Current developments of research abroad on language dynamic assessment. Modern Foreign Languages, 40(06): 837-847+74.

[11] Zhang, Y. H. (2010). Constructing dynamic assessment mode in college English writing class. Foreign Languages Bimonthly, 33(01): 46-50.

[12] Kong, W., Li, D. D., & Yu, G. X. (2013). A comparative study of peer-mediated intervention and teacher-mediated intervention in dynamic assessment of L2 writing. Foreign Language World, (03): 77-86.

[13] He, Y. (2013). The application of dynamic assessment theory in English process writing teaching. China University Teaching, 2013, (06): 52-54.

[14] Luo, J. (2020). Application of Markov chain in dynamic assessment in ESL teaching and learning. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 2020, (01): 26-33.

[15] Zhang, Y. H. (2008). The dynamic assessment mode for online EFL writing classes. Foreign Language World, (04): 73-81.

[16] Zhang, Y. H. (2014). The construction of teachers’ interventional strategies in the framework of EFL-classroom-based dynamic assessment. Foreign Language Testing and Teaching, (04): 38-46.

[17] Lan, X. X., & Liu, Y. (2010). A case study of dynamic assessment in EFL process writing. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(01): 24-40+73.

[18] Geng, X., Meng, Y. R., & Du, W. B. (2022). Research on computerized L2 dynamic assessment: Development and framework. Modern Foreign Languages, 45(01): 126-136.

[19] Li, L., & Gao, X. Y. (2023). A probe into the intervention mode of writing introduction to English education master’s academic thesis from the perspective of dynamic evaluation. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Language, 46(03): 26-34.

[20] Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic Assessment: An Interactional Approach To Evaluating Learning Potential (pp. 82–115). The Guilford Press.

[21] Zhang, P., & Cai, J. T. (2011). A dialectical and development-oriented teaching methodology—a review on dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Foreign Language Education in China, 4(01): 52-56.

[22] Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11-33.

[23] Ajideh, P., & Nourdad, N. (2012). The immediate and delayed effect of dynamic assessment on EFL reading ability. English Language Teaching, 5(12), 141-151.

[24] Regalla, M., & Peker, H. (2017). Prompting all students to learn: Examining dynamic assessment of special needs and typical students in a prekindergarten inclusive French program. Foreign Language Annals, 50(2), 323-338.

[25] Lu, Y. Y., & Hu, C. F. (2019). Dynamic assessment of phonological awareness in young foreign language learners: Predictability and modifiability. Reading and Writing, 32(4), 891-908.

[26] Grapin, S. E., & Llosa, L. (2021). Dynamic assessment of English learners in the content areas: An exploratory study in fifth‐grade science. TESOL Quarterly, 56(1), 201-229.

[27] Yang, Y. F., & Qian, D. D. (2023). Enhancing EFL learners’ reading proficiency through dynamic assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 20(1), 20-43.

[28] Budoff, M., & Friedman, M. (1964). “Learning potential” as an assessment approach to the adolescent mentally retarded. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28(5), 434–439.

[29] Guthke, J. (1982). The learning test concept – An alternative to the traditional static intelligence test. The German Journal of Psychology, 6 (4), 306–324.

[30] Guthke, J., Heinrich, A., & Caruso, M. (1986). The diagnostic program of “syntactical rule and vocabulary acquisition”– A contribution to the psychodiagnosis of foreign language learning ability. In F. Klix and H. Hagendorf (Eds.). Human Memory and Cognitive Capabilities. Mechanisms And Performances. Elsevier.

[31] Guthke, J. and Beckmann J. F. (2000). The learning test concept and its applications in practice. In C.S. Lidz and J.G. Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing Models And Applications. Elsevier.

[32] Fazlollahi, E., Marefat, F., & Vaezi, S. (2015). The application of dynamic assessment: Is it worth the effort? Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(5), 985-992.

[33] Mauludin, L. A. (2018). Dynamic assessment to improve students’ summary writing skill in an ESP class. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 6(4), 355-364.

[34] Shokoufeh, V., & Saman, E. (2019). Exploring EFL learners’ developmental errors in academic writing through face-to-dace and computer-mediated dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(3), 1-36.

[35] Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing l2 development during computerized dynamic assessment(c-da). Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 323-342.

[36] Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2015). Computerized dynamic assessment(c-da): Diagnosing l2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing, 32(3), 337-357.

[37] Zhang, R. C., Lai, H. M., Cheng, P. W., & Chen, C. P. (2017). Longitudinal effect of a computer-based graduated prompting assessment on students’ academic performance. Computers & Education, 110, 181-194.

[38] Bakhoda, I., & Shabani, K. (2019). Bringing L2 learners’ learning preferences in the mediating process through computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 210-236.

[39] Roud, L. F. P., & Hidri, S. (2021). Toward a sociocultural approach to computerized dynamic assessment of the TOEFL iBT listening comprehension test. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4943-4968.

[40] Shabani, K. (2018). Group dynamic assessment of L2 learners’ writing abilities. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(1),129-149.

[41] Alemi, M., Miri, M., & Mozafarnezhad, A. (2019). Investigating the effects of online concurrent group dynamic assessment on enhancing grammatical accuracy of EFL learners. International Journal of Language Testing, 9(2), 29-43.

[42] Afshari, H., Amirian, Z., & Tavakoli, M. (2020). Applying group dynamic assessment procedures to support EFL writing development: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions in focus. Journal of Writing Research, 11(3), 445-476.

[43] Wang, H. (2011). Analysis of college students’ writing ability by group dynamic assessment. Foreign Language Testing and Teaching, (03): 50-5.

[44] Kao, Y. T. (2022). “Effects of group dynamic assessment on L2 Chinese learners’ literacy development: Learners’ responsiveness to interactive mediation” Applied Linguistics Review, 13(5), 843-871.

[45] Moradian, M., Asadi, M., & Azadbakht, Z. (2019). Effects of concurrent group dynamic assessment on iranian EFL learners’ pragmatic competence: A case of requests and refusals. Research in Applied Linguistics, 10, 106-135.

[46] Miri, M., Alibakhshi, G., Kushki, A., & Bavarsad, P. S. (2017). Going beyond one-to-one mediation in zone of proximal development (ZPD): Concurrent and cumulative group dynamic assessment. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 1-24.

[47] Shrestha, P., & Coffin, C. (2011). Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development. Assessing Writing, 17(1), 55-70.

[48] Zhang, Y. H. (2013). Dynamic assessment in college English writing class. Shanghai International Studies University.

[49] Wang, H., & Zhen, F. C. (2014). Analysis on the effectiveness of diagnostic value of tutor mediation in dynamic writing assessment. Foreign Language Testing and Teaching, (01): 14-24.

[50] Qian, X., Meng, Y. R., & Yue, Z. (2023). Investigating the impact of dynamic assessment informed blended teaching on the development of paraphrasing. Foreign Language Education, 44(02): 63-68.