Under the new economic development situation, the I&E of college students must be oriented by curriculum ideology and politics, making it the mainstream of the society, so as to truly achieve the ultimate goal of the country's implementation of the I&E strategy. At present, Chinese colleges and universities lack an effective collaborative innovation mechanism, this has emerged as a significant barrier to China's innovation talent growth, and I&E education in colleges and universities has been prioritized. In the context of artificial intelligence (AI) and collaborative innovation mechanisms, this paper found to investigate the importance of deeply integrating ideological & political curriculum aspects with I&E education. For the purpose of describing the benefits and drawbacks of the integration of the two in the context of AI, this study suggests a SWOT (Strengths, weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis. On the basis of the AI Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, this article assessed the environment of the two when they are combined. The evaluation results found that the AI environment was conducive to the fusion of the two. The experimental findings in this research demonstrated that, 51% of students believed that doing so is absolutely essential when it came to the question of whether it is important to integrate the two, while 23% believed that doing so was necessary. Students who believed that integrating the two was generally necessary made up 14% of the student population, while students who believed that integrating the two was not necessary made up 6% of the student population and students who believed that integrating the two was completely unnecessary made up 6% of the student population. It was evident that most students desire to combine the two in order to advance ideological & political development as well as the development of new thinking.

Huawei Wan. A Probe into the Deep Integration and the Collaborative Innovation Mechanism of Ideological and Political Elements and Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education under the Environment of AI. Frontiers in Educational Research (2025), Vol. 8, Issue 4: 271-279. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2025.080440.

[1] Ishmukhametov E M, Khisaeva A I, Gaysina R R. Institutional Trends of Entrepreneurship Development in The Republic of Bashkortostan[J]. Bulletin USPTU Science education economy Series economy, 2020, 2(32):92-100.

[2] Han G, Liu R, Guan J. Exploration of Organic Chemistry Teaching under the Background of Course Ideology and Politics[J]. University Chemistry, 2019, 34(11):56-60.

[3] Luo Y. Artificial intelligence model for real-time monitoring of ideological & political teaching system[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 40(1):1-10.

[4] Pepin M, Audebrand L K, Tremblay M. Evolving students' conceptions about responsible entrepreneurship: a classroom experiment[J]. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 2021, 28(4):570-585.

[5] wen F J, Yang Z, Ou Y G. "Government-Industry-University-Research- Promotion" Collaborative Innovation Mechanism Construction to Promote the Development of Agricultural Machinery Technology - ScienceDirect[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2018, 51(17):552-559.

[6] Gu Xinsheng. On Collaborative Innovation Mechanism of National Defense Science and Technology Industry in China[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 233(4): 42035-42036.

[7] Thrall J H, Li X, Li Q. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Radiology: Opportunities, Challenges, Pitfalls, and Criteria for Success[J]. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2018, 15(3):504-508.

[8] Sudarmo S, Rasmita R, Satria E. Investigation of best digital technological practices in millennial classroom innovation: critical review study[J]. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2021, 4(1):98-105.

[9] Hou Y. Students' emotional analysis on ideological & political teaching classes based on artificial intelligence and data mining[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 40(2):1-9.

[10] Kim S, Jeong Y. Exploring AI-based Teaching and Learning Activities for Software Education in Kindergarteners to the Second Graders[J]. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 2020, 24(5):413-421.

[11] Adomaityt-Subaien I, Girkontait A, Petruyt D. Experiences of Social Entrepreneurship Pioneers in Lithuania[J]. Socialinė Teorija Empirija Politika ir Praktika, 2020, 21(2):8-25.

[12] Han W. Construction and innovation of new foreign language classroom teaching mode based on the "Internet Plus"[J]. IPPTA: Quarterly Journal of Indian Pulp and Paper Technical Association, 2018, 30(7):439-446.

[13] Francene, Larzelere, Lauren. Evaluation of an Entrepreneurship Education Intervention for American Indian Adolescents: Trial Design and Baseline Sample Characteristics. [J]. American Indian and Alaska native mental health research (Online), 2019, 26(3):1-20.

[14] Wu D, Shen H, Lv Z. An artificial intelligence and multimedia teaching platform based integration path of IPE and IEE in colleges and universities1[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 40(115):1-10.

[15] Lychuk M, Bilous N, Isaienko S. European Journal of Educational Research Smart Automated Language Teaching Through the Smart Sender Platform[J]. European Journal of Educational Research, 2021, 10(2):841-854.