Frontiers in Medical Science Research, 2025, 7(3); doi: 10.25236/FMSR.2025.070316.
Jing Kou1, Fanxiang Lin1, Xuanrui Deng1, Weiyao Zheng1, Pengfei Han2
1First Clinical College, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046000, China
2Department of Orthopedics, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046000, China
This investigation employs advanced bibliometric visualization techniques to elucidate key research foci and emerging trends in post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis (PTOA) while analyzing global research patterns. Using the Web of Science Core Collection (Science Citation Index-Expanded), we systematically extracted scholarly publications on PTOA from January 1, 1900, to April 16, 2025. Through rigorous bibliometric analysis and systematic indexing of source data, we implemented VOSviewer (v1.6.20) to conduct multidimensional assessments including collaborative network mapping,term co-occurrence analysis, bibliographic coupling, and citation network evaluation. Our comprehensive analysis of 1,488 peer-reviewed articles revealed consistent annual growth in global PTOA research output. The United States emerged as the dominant contributor, demonstrating the highest publication volume, citation counts, and h-index values. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage and Journal of Orthopaedic Research were identified as the most prolific journals, while four institutions—Harvard University, Lund University, the University of Calgary, and the Hospital for Special Surgery—stood out as leading research centers. Three primary research domains were identified:mechanistic studies, clinical investigations, and tissue regeneration research. Projections indicate that clinical translational research, particularly studies on total joint arthroplasty for PTOA management, will dominate future research directions. These findings establish the United States as the field's primary knowledge producer while highlighting clinical applications as the next research frontier in PTOA therapeutics.
Post-Traumatic Knee Osteoarthritis; Global Trends; Bibliometrics; Visualization Analysis
Jing Kou, Fanxiang Lin, Xuanrui Deng, Weiyao Zheng, Pengfei Han. Research on Traumatic Knee Osteoarthritis: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study. Frontiers in Medical Science Research (2025), Vol. 7, Issue 3: 115-125. https://doi.org/10.25236/FMSR.2025.070316.
[1] Dilley J E, Bello M A, Roman N, et al. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis: A review of pathogenic mechanisms and novel targets for mitigation[J]. Bone reports, 2023, 18: 101658.
[2] Evers B J, Van Den Bosch M H J, Blom A B, et al. Post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis; the role of inflammation and hemarthrosis on disease progression[J]. Frontiers in Medicine, 2022, 9: 973870.
[3] Khella C M, Asgarian R, Horvath J M, et al. An evidence-based systematic review of human knee post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA): timeline of clinical presentation and disease markers, comparison of knee joint PTOA models and early disease implications[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021, 22(4): 1996.
[4] Whittaker J L, Losciale J M, Juhl C B, et al. Risk factors for knee osteoarthritis after traumatic knee injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies for the OPTIKNEE Consensus[J]. British journal of sports medicine, 2022, 56(24): 1406-1421.
[5] Wang L J, Zeng N, Yan Z P, et al. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis following ACL injury[J]. Arthritis research & therapy, 2020, 22: 1-8.
[6] Khella C M, Horvath J M, Asgarian R, Rolauffs B, Hart M L. Anti-Inflammatory Therapeutic Approaches to Prevent or Delay Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis (PTOA) of the Knee Joint with a Focus on Sustained Delivery Approaches. Int J Mol Sci. 2021, 22(15):8005. doi: 10.3390/ijms22158005.
[7] Hassan W, Duarte A E. Bibliometric analysis: a few suggestions[J]. Current problems in cardiology, 2024: 102640.
[8] Zhao T, Zhang Y, Dai Z, et al. Bibliometric and visualized analysis of scientific publications on ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament based on Web of science[J]. World Neurosurgery, 2021, 149: e231-e243.
[9] Ellul T, Bullock N, Abdelrahman T, et al. The 100 most cited manuscripts in emergency abdominal surgery: a bibliometric analysis[J]. International Journal of Surgery, 2017, 37: 29-35.
[10] Yang K, Pei L, Wen K, et al. Investigating research hotspots and publication trends of spinal stenosis: a bibliometric analysis during 2000–2018[J]. Frontiers in Medicine, 2021, 8: 556022.
[11] Ninkov A, Frank J R, Maggio L A. Bibliometrics: methods for studying academic publishing[J]. Perspectives on medical education, 2022, 11(3): 173-176.
[12] Mao X, Guo L, Fu P, et al. The status and trends of coronavirus research: A global bibliometric and visualized analysis[J]. Medicine, 2020, 99(22): e20137.
[13] Roldan-Valadez E, Salazar-Ruiz S Y, Ibarra-Contreras R, et al. Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics[J]. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971-), 2019, 188: 939-951.
[14] Culliford D, Maskell J, Judge A, et al. Future projections of total hip and knee arthroplasty in the UK: results from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink[J]. Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2015, 23(4): 594-600.
[15] Wang K, Xing D, Dong S, et al. The global state of research in nonsurgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a bibliometric and visualized study[J]. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019, 20: 1-10.