Aiming to address the issues of single teaching methods, the lack of students' subjectivity, and insufficient personalized guidance in automotive parts design and modeling, this paper constructs a mixed teaching system: “three-dimensional module drive + dual-track integration implementation + whole-process quantitative evaluation.” By dividing three modules: theoretical study, literature reading and practical application, the closed-loop teaching of "preview on the front line of class-deepening off the middle line of class-project expansion after class" is realized by relying on the online platform, and a multi-dimensional evaluation mechanism is established. Practical data show that after the reform, the average score of students' courses has increased by 8.87 points, the passing rate has increased by 19.06%, and their interest in learning and autonomous learning ability have been significantly enhanced. This paper provides an operable implementation path a practical basis for the mixed teaching reform of engineering practical courses.

Han Lu. A Blended Online-Offline Model for Cultivating High-Order Engineering Ability in "Automotive Parts Design and Modeling". Frontiers in Educational Research (2025), Vol. 8, Issue 7: 151-157. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2025.080722.

[1] He, K. (2005). Viewing the new development of educational technology theory from Blending Learning. Journal of National Institute of Educational Administration, (9), 37–48.

[2] Luo, L., Cheng, X., Wang, S., Zhang, J., Zhu, W., Yang, J., & Liu, P. (2017). Blended learning with Moodle in medical statistics: An assessment of knowledge, attitudes and practices relating to e-learning. BMC Medical Education, 17, Article 169.

[3] Wang, X. (2021). Online and offline blended teaching of college English in the Internet environment. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Applications and Techniques in Cyber Intelligence (ATCI 2021) (pp. 123–131). Springer.

[4] Pan, A. (2022). Construction and application of a college English blended teaching system based on multidata fusion. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, Article 8823451. 

[5] Dong, H. (2022). Teaching design of “three-dimensional” blended ideological and political courses from the perspective of deep learning. Security and Communication Networks, 2022, Article 8877665. 

[6] Han, C., & Huang, J. (2022). Effect of "Internet+" 5G information technology on blended teaching: A test based on counterfactual method. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(12), 45–58. 

[7] Cheng, X., Mo, W., & Duan, Y. (2023). Factors contributing to learning satisfaction with blended learning teaching mode among higher education students in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1098234.

[8] Moskalenko, L., Huleikova, I., Kushnir, H., Adamenko, S., & Yefimov, D. (2024). Psychological aspects of blended learning in Ukraine. Conhecimento & Diversidade, 16(1), 112–125.

[9] Liang, L. (2024). Exploring the teaching reform path of ideological and political education in colleges and universities in the context of deep learning. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 345–356.

[10] Huang, R., Zhou, Y., & Wang, Y. (2006). Theory and practice of blended learning. Higher Education Press.

[11] Meng, X., Niu, D., Ding, L., & Wang, L. (2024). Research on the effect of mixed teaching strategies on students' ambidextrous innovation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, Article 101390.

[12] Leidl, D. M., Ritchie, L., & Moslemi, N. (2020). Blended learning in undergraduate nursing education—A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 86, 104318.

[13] McCutcheon, K., O’Halloran, P., & Lohan, M. (2018). Online learning versus blended learning of clinical supervisee skills with pre-registration nursing students: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 82, 30–39.

[14] Yang, K. (2018). Theory and model of instructional design. Electronic Industry Press.