Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2020, 3(6); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2020.030614.

Moral Evaluation of Contemporary Life Science and Technology Based on Constitutional Boundary


Ziqi Chu

Corresponding Author:
Ziqi Chu

School of Law, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266071, China
[email protected]


In a sense, human beings, especially life science and technology personnel, are playing the role of God. They not only use transgenic technology to develop species that could not exist in nature, but also break the dilemma that some organ diseases are difficult to cure through organ transplantation. The research object of life science and technology is human body, which is the understanding, transformation and utilization of human inner nature, which makes life science and technology activities need special moral defense, and the appropriate moral defense should be deontology rather than teleology. In a contemporary world with diversified values and uncertain development of science and technology, we should cherish the value of human civilization and pay more attention to the constitutional function and value. We should cultivate the professional conscience of life science and technology workers and strengthen their sense of moral responsibility, so that life science and technology can be applied well in daily life for the benefit of mankind.


Constitutional boundaries, Life science and technology, Moral evaluation

Cite This Paper

Ziqi Chu. Moral Evaluation of Contemporary Life Science and Technology Based on Constitutional Boundary. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2020) Vol. 3, Issue 6: 128-134. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2020.030614.


[1] Chen Lifen, Guo Wenya. Controversy and consensus: Evaluation of the moral status of contemporary Chinese society [J]. Journal of Hubei Administration College, 2017(2):31-35.
[2] Zheng Yushuang. Life Science and Human Destiny: A Legal Review of Gene Editing[J]. Legal System and Social Development, 2019, 025(004):185-201.
[3] Tang Zeng, Wang Zhangsheng, Fu Hua. Life quality assessment and clinical practice[J]. Medicine and Philosophy, 2016, 37(02):1-4.
[4] Ruan Yonghua. Re-understanding of the professional ethical standards of asset evaluation under the new situation [J]. State-owned Assets Management, 2018(2):30-33.
[5]  Li Wenjing, Wang Quanquan. On Life Moral Education from Perspective of Educational Ecology[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 016(002):101-108.
[6] Liang Hong, Pan Xiaofeng, Yu Xinfan, et al. Evaluation of the service function value of Shenzhen aquatic ecosystem[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016(9):1474-1487.
[7] Wang Ruile, Yang Qi, Wang Haibin. Moral Judgment and Moral Concept: The Predictive Role of Life History Strategies[J]. Journal of Leshan Teachers College, 2018, 033(006):126-132.
[8] Zhang Yongjuan, Zhang Liwen, Ruan Meihua, et al. π index analysis report of output evaluation of life science and basic medical global scientific research institutions [J]. Theory and Practice of Think Tank, 2019, 4(01):90-100.