Based on the theories of linguistic typology and cognitive linguistics, this paper compares the typological differences between Chinese and Uyghur in the expression of spatial relations. Using Talmy's lexicalization patterns and the Figure-Ground Theory as analytical tools, it examines the encoding mechanisms and syntactic strategies of the two languages from the dimensions of static location and dynamic motion. In terms of static location, Chinese flexibly adjusts the salience order of "Figure-Ground" through word order, while Uyghur highlights the spatial relation itself via morphological encapsulation. In dynamic motion, Chinese presents sequentially scanned paths through "linear serial clauses," whereas Uyghur achieves the overall packaging of paths with "case marker chains + core verbs," resulting in a compact structure. The study finds that these differences stem from the opposition in grammatical types: Chinese constructs spatial semantics through modular lexical combinations, while Uyghur encapsulates spatial information via morphological markers. Such differences not only affect the representation of physical space but also map onto the domain of abstract cognition. This research provides theoretical and practical references for Chinese-Uyghur contrastive studies, bilingual teaching, and cross-cultural communication.

Li Yong. A Contrastive Analysis of Chinese-Uyghur Spatial Relation Constructions from a Typological Perspective. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2025), Vol. 8, Issue 11: 101-109. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2025.081117.

[1] Zhang Keding.Cognitive study of spatial relation constructions[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2016.

[2] Zhu Xiaojun.Cognitive semantic study of space category[D].East China Normal University,2008.

[3] Deng Mianlin.The metaphor and representation of power[D].East China Normal University,2013.

[4] Ma Rongzi.A cognitive study on the lexicalization patterns of English and Chinese motion verbs[D]. China University of Petroleum(East China),2016.

[5] Mary.Comparative analysis of Chinese-Uyghur displacement event framework[D].Xinjiang Normal University,2016.

[6] Liang Zichao.Lexicalization Patterns of Paths in Modern Chinese Movement Events[D].Northeast Normal University,2020.DOI:10.27011/d.cnki.gdbsu.2020.00034.

[7] Wang Ying.Study on the corresponding expression of Chinese comparative sentences in Uyghur language[D].Xinjiang Normal University,2022.DOI:10.27432/d.cnki.gxsfu.2022.000583.

[8] Yu Xiujin,Jin Lixin.Cognitive typology:a cognitive interpretation of cross-linguistic differences and commonalities[J].Foreign language teaching,2019,40(04):13-19.

[9] Shen Da.A study on the coercion of spatial displacement relation constructions from the perspective of cognitive grammar[J].Journal of Guangdong Second Normal University,2018,38(02):71-78.

[10] Zhang Meitao,Pan Yanlan.The expression of spatial relations in Uyghur inter-sentential relations[J].Bilingual Education Research,2017,4(03):45-52.

[11] Gao Yuan,Wu Chang'an.A cognitive study of the spatial relation construction of the Chinese locative word"[J]. Journal of Social Sciences of Hunan Normal University,2016,45(01):141-145.

[12] Zhang Keding.Some basic questions about spatial relation constructions[J].Shandong Foreign Language Teaching,2013,34(03):7-16.

[13] Xue Yuping.An Analysis of Spatial Relations and Spatial Structures in Modern Uyghur[J].Language and Translation,2012,(03):37-42.

[14] Zhu Haiyan.A Contrastive Study of the Mapping Patterns of Space-time Metaphors in English and Chinese[J]. Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Sciences),2009,36(06):115-119.