Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2026, 9(3); doi: 10.25236/FER.2026.090318.

Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Vocal Pedagogy: A Conceptual Framework for Chinese Higher Education

Author(s)

Tingyu Yan1, Hong Yu1

Corresponding Author:
Hong Yu
Affiliation(s)

1School of Music, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) already influences the practice of education, and the pedagogical impacts of AI on the vocal training are not theorized sufficiently. The paper proposes a theory that describes the idea of AI-improved change in the sphere of vocal education in the Chinese higher education. The paper conceptualizes AI as more than a technological tool based on the embodied and experiential learning, self-regulated learning and purposeful practice, and human-AI collaborative creativity. The three changes in training the voice which were identified during the analysis are the change of teacher-cantered training to feedback-based and data-driven learning, the change of experience-based training to reflective and self-regulated training, and the change of individual practice to a human-artificial intelligence learning. The feedback systems that have been improved with the help of AI enable to track the performance constantly and encourage the isolated development of the skills, in the meantime, the adaptive learning environment strengthens the feeling of metacognition and habits of regular practicing. In the meantime, AI-based creative spaces are used to strengthen the interpretive exploration and impose the artistic agency. The study is contextualized on the higher education system in the Chinese system in which the focus has been on the imperative to execute pedagogically, teacher digital competence, equitable access and cultural responsiveness. Offering the theoretically grounded perspective, the paper will contribute to the enhancement of the existing discourse on the topic of technology-enhanced music education and will offer the contextually relevant ways of merging innovation and artistic integrity in the sphere of vocal training.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence in music education; vocal pedagogy; self-regulated learning; embodied learning; human–AI co-creation; Chinese higher education

Cite This Paper

Tingyu Yan, Hong Yu. Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Vocal Pedagogy: A Conceptual Framework for Chinese Higher Education. Frontiers in Educational Research (2026), Vol. 9, Issue 3: 119-128. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2026.090318.

References

[1] Zawacki-Richter O, Marín VI, Bond M, Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International journal of educational technology in higher education. 2019 Oct 28;16(1):39.

[2] Holmes W, Bialik M, Fadel C. Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign; 2019 Feb 28.

[3] Chen Y, Sun Y. The usage of artificial intelligence technology in music education system under deep learning. IEEE Access. 2024 Sep 12; 12: 130546-56.

[4] Mazlan CA, Koning SI, Yusoff MY, Hassim DS, Hidayatullah R, Jamnongsarn S. Artificial Intelligence in Music Education: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions. In2025 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE) 2025 May 14 (pp. 713-717). IEEE.

[5] Bai J. Design of the artificial intelligence vocal system for music education by using speech recognition simulation. Computational intelligence and neuroscience. 2022;2022(1):5066004.

[6] Jing L. Application of artificial intelligence algorithm and VR technology in vocal music teaching. Mobile Information Systems. 2022;2022(1):2320198.

[7] Li W, Cui X, Manoharan P, Dai L, Liu K, Huang L. AI-assisted feedback and reflection in vocal music training: effects on metacognition and singing performance. Frontiers in Psychology. 2025 Aug 18;16:1598867.

[8] Soncin M, Cannistrà M. Data analytics in education: are schools on the long and winding road?. Qualitative research in accounting & management. 2022 Jun 6;19(3):286-304.

[9] Wang S, Christensen C, Cui W, Tong R, Yarnall L, Shear L, Feng M. When adaptive learning is effective learning: comparison of an adaptive learning system to teacher-led instruction. Interactive learning environments. 2023 Feb 17;31(2):793-803.

[10] Di Mitri D, Schneider J, Drachsler H. Keep me in the loop: Real-time feedback with multimodal data. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2022 Dec;32(4):1093-118.

[11] Ma J, Ma L, Qi S, Zhang B, Ruan W. A practical study of artificial intelligence-based real-time feedback in online physical education teaching. Smart Learning Environments. 2025 Aug 15;12(1):52.

[12] Hou X. Big Data-Driven Analysis of Music Learning Behavior: Personalized Teaching Recommendations and Learning Strategy Optimization. Applied and Computational Engineering. 2024 Dec 19;118:8-13.

[13] Abdullayeva M. DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN MUSIC EDUCATION: OPPORTUNITIES AND PEDAGOGICAL CHALLENGES. Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal. 2026 Jan 23;7(01):13-21.

[14] Cheng L. The impact of generative AI on school music education: Challenges and recommendations. Arts Education Policy Review. 2025 Oct 2;126(4):255-62.

[15] Merchán Sánchez-Jara JF, González Gutiérrez S, Cruz Rodríguez J, Syroyid Syroyid B. Artificial intelligence-assisted music education: A critical synthesis of challenges and opportunities. Education Sciences. 2024 Oct 28;14(11):1171.

[16] Dell’Anna A, Leman M, Berti A. Musical interaction reveals music as embodied language. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2021 Jul 14;15:667838.

[17] Juntunen ML. Embodied learning by responding to music through movement. London NI 9JF, UK: Routledge. 2024.

[18] MacDonald R, Saarikallio S. Musical identities in action: Embodied, situated, and dynamic. Musicae Scientiae. 2022 Dec; 26(4):729-45.

[19] Faza A, Lestari IA. Self-regulated learning in the digital age: A systematic review of strategies, technologies, benefits, and challenges. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2025 May; 26(2):23-58.

[20] Zimmerman BJ. Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American educational research journal. 2008 Mar;45(1):166-83.

[21] Irons A, Elkington S. Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. Routledge; 2021 Aug 25.

[22] Donoghue A, Navarro K, Diederich E, Auerbach M, Cheng A. Deliberate practice and mastery learning in resuscitation education: a scoping review. Resuscitation plus. 2021 Jun 1;6:100137.

[23] Song K, Kim S, Zhao Y. Manifesting multidimensional creativity in a technology‐mediated online TESOL practicum course. TESOL Journal. 2020 Jun; 11(2):e472.

[24] Figoli FA, Rampino L, Mattioli F. AI in design idea development: A workshop on creativity and human-AI collaboration. Proceedings of DRS. 2022:1-7.

[25] Cheng M. The creativity of artificial intelligence in art. InProceedings 2022 Apr 6 (Vol. 81, No. 1, p. 110). MDPI.

[26] Zhukabayeva T, Baumuratova D, Zholshiyeva L, Karabay A, Abdrakhmanov K. Digital transformation in higher education: Toward a national model of digital university in Kazakhstan through global and local comparison. Sustainability. 2025 Dec 12; 17(24):11132.

[27] Hawkins JN, Jacob WJ, Wenli LI. Higher education in China: Access, equity and equality. Inequality in education. 2009:215-39.