Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2020, 3(7); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2020.030705.

China's Administrative Reconsideration and Administrative Litigation Cohesion Mechanism

Author(s)

Lei Chen

Corresponding Author:
Lei Chen
Affiliation(s)

Law School of Sichuan University of science & Engineering, Yibin Sichuan 644000, China
[email protected]

Abstract

In the long-term development process of administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation, many countries have become effective legal systems to protect national rights and properly handle administrative disputes. With the gradual deepening of practice, the current administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation connection model gradually revealed many problems and deficiencies, which urgently need to be resolved and improved. Administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation, as the two most important methods of dispute resolution in the field of administrative law in China, have many similarities, but there are also big differences. They both take effective protection of civil rights as their ultimate goal. The two relief systems have their own advantages. They can achieve effective convergence through mutual cooperation, so as to efficiently handle administrative disputes and better protect citizens' legitimate rights. Through an in-depth analysis of the problems existing in the connection between administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation in China, we have drawn a summary of legal considerations on perfecting the connection between the two procedures, and finally realized a good connection between administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation to help it better protect the administration. The legitimate rights of the opposite person.

Keywords

administrative reconsideration, administrative litigation, cohesion

Cite This Paper

Lei Chen. China's Administrative Reconsideration and Administrative Litigation Cohesion Mechanism. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2020) Vol. 3, Issue 7: 41-52. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2020.030705.

References

[1] Yang Hong. Research on the connection between administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation [J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2013 (06): 32-41.
[2] Liu Ji. Research on the judicial relief of administrative compensation [D]. Chongqing University, 2016.
[3] Wang Wanhua. Improve the linkage mechanism between administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation [J]. China Judicature, 2019 (10): 53-56.
[4] Jiang Mingan. Administrative Law and Administrative Litigation Law (Seventh Edition) [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2019 edition.
[5] Zhang Zhiyuan. A new theory of the connection between administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation: an observation based on the perspective of resolving administrative disputes [J]. Application of Laws, 2017 (23): 27-31.
[6] Wang Yangwen. The division of public power and the inheritance of the relief system: Reflections on the relationship between administrative litigation and administrative reconsideration [J]. Fujian Forum (Social Science Education Edition), 2009 (12): 4-6.
[6] Wang Mingyang. French Administrative Law [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2007 edition, pages 552-553.
[7] Zheng Shuo. On the "Exhaustive Administrative Relief Principle" in the United States [J]. Administrative Law Studies, 2012 (03): 127-134.
[8] Wang Yangwen. The division of public power and the inheritance of the relief system: Reflections on the relationship between administrative litigation and administrative reconsideration [J]. Fujian Forum (Social Science Education Edition), 2009 (12): 4-6.
[9] Yang Hong. Theoretical basis of the connection between administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation [J]. Journal of Gansu University of Political Science and Law, 2016 (05): 47-56.