Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of New Developments in Education, 2026, 8(3); doi: 10.25236/IJNDE.2026.080306.

Effects of AI-Mediated Response Tools on Student Motivation and Engagement in Project-Based English Language Learning

Author(s)

Ruorui Xue

Corresponding Author:
Ruorui Xue
Affiliation(s)

School of Foreign Languages, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into education, its potential role in project-based English language learning (PBL) requires empirical investigation. This study examined the effects of AI-mediated response tools on seventh-grade students’ motivation and classroom engagement in a junior high school in eastern China. Ninety-four students from two intact classes participated, with one class receiving AI-supported PBL instruction and the other completing similar tasks without AI support. Data were collected through a motivation questionnaire, classroom observation, and semi-structured interviews. Results showed that the AI-supported group reported significantly higher motivation and confidence. Observational findings also indicated greater participation and engagement in oral activities. However, interview data revealed challenges related to limited routine use and implementation constraints. The findings suggest that AI-supported PBL can enhance student motivation and engagement, while highlighting the need for sustainable integration and teacher support in everyday classroom practice.

Keywords

AI in education; project-based English language learning; student motivation; student engagement

Cite This Paper

Ruorui Xue. Effects of AI-Mediated Response Tools on Student Motivation and Engagement in Project-Based English Language Learning. International Journal of New Developments in Education (2026), Vol. 8, Issue 3: 39-46. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2026.080306.

References

[1] Zawacki-Richter O, Marín V I, Bond M, Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education[J]. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2019, 16(1): 1–27.

[2] Crosthwaite P, Sun SY. Generative AI and L2 written feedback studies: A scoping review[J]. RELC Journal, 2025, early access. DOI:10.1177/00336882251386530.

[3] Mohamed A M. Exploring the potential of an AI-based chatbot (ChatGPT) in enhancing English as a foreign language (EFL) teaching: Perceptions of EFL faculty members[J]. Education and Information Technologies, 2024, 29(3): 3195–3217.

[4] Chiang YHV, Chang MG, Chen NS. Can generative AI help realize the shift from an outcome-oriented to a process-outcome-balanced educational practice?[J]. Educational Technology & Society, 2024, 27(2): 347-385. DOI:10.30191/ETS.202404_27(2).TP04.

[5] McCarthy K S, Roscoe R D, Allen L K, Likens A D, McNamara D S. Automated writing evaluation: Does spelling and grammar feedback support high-quality writing and revision?[J]. Assessing Writing, 2022, 52: 100608.

[6] Cui W Y, Zhang J. AI applications in language learning: Improving speaking fluency and pronunciation using chatbots and speech feedback[J]. Interactive Learning Environments, 2025, (early access): DOI:10.1080/10494820.2025.2546634.

[7] Kasneci E, Sessler K, Küchemann S, Bannert M, Dementieva D, Fischer F, Kasneci G. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education[J]. Learning and Individual Differences, 2023, 103: 102274.

[8] Zheng Y, Yu S L, Tong Z N. Understanding the dynamic of student engagement in project-based collaborative writing: Insights from a longitudinal case study[J]. Language Teaching Research, 2022, (early access): DOI:10.1177/13621688221115808.

[9] Narciss S. Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks[M]// Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. New York: Routledge, 2008: 125–140.

[10] Ranalli J. Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it?[J]. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2021, 34(7): 1019–1045.

[11] Rahimi M, Fathi J, Zou D. Exploring the impact of automated written corrective feedback on the academic writing skills of EFL learners: An activity theory perspective[J]. Education and Information Technologies, 2025, 30(3): 2691–2735.

[12] Aldino A A, Maheshi B, Li Y, Zhou Y, Tsai Y S, Gašević D, Chen G. Enhancing learner-centered feedback with AI: Teachers’ practices and perceptions[J]. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2026: 1–18.

[13] Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology[J]. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006, 3(2): 77–101.

[14] Benlaghrissi H, Ouahidi L M. The impact of mobile-assisted project-based learning on developing EFL students’ speaking skills[J]. Smart Learning Environments, 2024, 11(1): 18.

[15] Zhang C, Meng Y, Ma X. Artificial intelligence in EFL speaking: Impact on enjoyment, anxiety, and willingness to communicate[J]. System, 2024, 121: 103259.

[16] Wu Y, Schunn C D. The effects of providing and receiving peer feedback on writing performance and learning of secondary school students[J]. American Educational Research Journal, 2021, 58(3): 492–526.