Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2026, 9(8); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2026.090808.

Strategic Infrastructure and Regional Influence: Institutional Interfaces at Chabahar Port

Author(s)

Yujuan Zhou

Corresponding Author:
Yujuan Zhou
Affiliation(s)

Eastern Language College, Zhejiang Yuexiu University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China

Abstract

Infrastructure is often described as strategically important. Yet substantiating strategic value and attributing regional influence require different evidence. The study examines Chabahar Port with an integrated framework drawing on strategic infrastructure, port regionalization, corridor governance, and relational power. Strategic value attribution, governance arrangements, functional developments, partner decisions, and influence attribution are kept distinct. The method is an exploratory mechanism-based case study of three bounded cooperation episodes, using episode-level reconstruction, within-case comparison, and claim-level evidence assessment. Episode B is the principal episode for bounded process reconstruction; Episodes A and C contribute complementary commitment records. The selected public records repeatedly attribute strategic purposes and distinguish authorizations, responsibilities, and commitments as governance objects. In Episode B, India Ports Global Limited explicitly invoked a reported temporary permission arrangement as the basis for its bidding-process decision. This bounded institutional link leaves the broader relationships from governance to focal partner acceptance and from Iranian action to regional influence unresolved. The contribution is an integrated framework and a case reconstruction that distinguishes documented institutional links from unresolved influence claims. Distinguishing institutional arrangements and functional observation from influence attribution specifies what evidence a conversion explanation requires. Incomplete attribution limits the claims supported by the available record; it does not establish the absence of influence.

Keywords

Strategic Infrastructure, Chabahar Port, Iran, Regional Influence, Corridor Governance, Port Regionalization

Cite This Paper

Yujuan Zhou. Strategic Infrastructure and Regional Influence: Institutional Interfaces at Chabahar Port. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2026), Vol. 9, Issue 8: 53-60. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2026.090808.

References

[1] Schindler S, Kanai J M. Getting the territory right: infrastructure-led development and the re-emergence of spatial planning strategies[J]. Regional Studies, 2021, 55(1): 40-51. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1661984.

[2] Schindler S, DiCarlo J, Paudel D. The new cold war and the rise of the 21st-century infrastructure state[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2022, 47(2): 331-346. DOI: 10.1111/tran.12480.

[3] Easterling K. Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space[M]. Verso, 2014.

[4] Larkin B. The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure[J]. Annual Review of Anthropology, 2013, 42: 327-343. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522.

[5] Omidi A, Noolkar-Oak G. Geopolitics of Chabahar Port for Iran, India and Afghanistan[J]. South Asia Research, 2022, 42(1): 21-39. DOI: 10.1177/02627280211055981.

[6] Pant H V. India-Iran Cooperation at Chabahar Port: Choppy Waters[EB/OL]. (2018-04-02)[2026-10-01]. https://www.csis.org/analysis/india-iran-cooperation-chabahar-port-choppy-waters.

[7] Pal L C. The International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) and India: potential and impediments[J]. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 2024, 44(3): e243556. DOI: 10.1590/0101-31572024-3556.

[8] Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways. Long-term Main Contract for development of Shahid Beheshti Port Terminal, Chabahar signed between India Port Global Limited (IPGL) and Ports and Maritime Organization (PMO) of Iran[EB/OL]. (2024-05-13)[2026-10-01]. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2020454.

[9] Notteboom T E, Rodrigue J-P. Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2005, 32(3): 297-313. DOI: 10.1080/03088830500139885.

[10] Brunner H-P. What is Economic Corridor Development and What Can It Achieve in Asia’s Subregions?[R]. ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, No. 117. Asian Development Bank, 2013[2026-10-01]. https://www.adb.org/publications/economic-corridor-development-and-what-it-can-achieve-in-asia-subregions.

[11] Singh S, Singh B. Geopolitics of ports: Factoring Iran in India’s counterbalancing strategy for “Sino-Pak Axis”[J]. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2019, 10(2): 169-182. DOI: 10.1177/1879366519850712.

[12] Noorali H, Ahmadi S A. Iran's new geopolitics: heartland of the world’s corridors[J]. GeoJournal, 2023, 88(2): 1889-1904. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-022-10727-z.

[13] Dadparvar S, Kaleji V. The Chabahar Transit Project: Transition from Geo-Politics to Geo-Economics[J]. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 2025, 27(3): 283-308. DOI: 10.1080/19448953.2024.2379670.

[14] Baldwin D A. Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends versus Old Tendencies[J]. World Politics, 1979, 31(2): 161-194. DOI: 10.2307/2009941.

[15] Nye J S. Power and foreign policy[J]. Journal of Political Power, 2011, 4(1): 9-24. DOI: 10.1080/2158379X.2011.555960.

[16] Blackwill R D, Harris J M. War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft[M]. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016.

[17] Scholvin S, Wigell M. Power politics by economic means: Geoeconomics as an analytical approach and foreign policy practice[J]. Comparative Strategy, 2018, 37(1): 73-84. DOI: 10.1080/01495933.2018.1419729.

[18] Wigell M. Conceptualizing regional powers’ geoeconomic strategies: neo-imperialism, neo-mercantilism, hegemony, and liberal institutionalism[J]. Asia Europe Journal, 2016, 14(2): 135-151. DOI: 10.1007/s10308-015-0442-x.

[19] Keohane R O, Nye J S. Power and Interdependence[M]. 4th ed. Longman / Pearson, 2012.

[20] Carse A, Kneas D. Unbuilt and Unfinished: The Temporalities of Infrastructure[J]. Environment and Society: Advances in Research, 2019, 10(1): 9-28. DOI: 10.3167/ares.2019.100102.

[21] Larsen M, Jenss A, Schuetze B, et al. Elsewheres of the Unbuilt: The Global Effects of Transnational Energy Infrastructure Projects[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2024, 48(5): 916-935. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.13265.

[22] Cabinet. India's participation in the development of Chahbahar port in Iran[EB/OL]. (2014-10-18)[2026-10-01]. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?lang=2&reg=48&relid=110685.

[23] Prime Minister's Office. India-Iran Joint Statement during Visit of the President of Iran to India (February 17, 2018)[EB/OL]. (2018-02-17)[2026-10-01]. https://www.pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1520840.

[24] Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways. Development of Chabahar Port[EB/OL]. (2024-07-26)[2026-10-01]. https://www.pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=2037450.

[25] Cabinet. Cabinet approves provision of Credit of 150 Million USD to Islamic Republic of Iran for Chabahar Port Development[EB/OL]. (2016-02-24)[2026-10-01]. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?lang=2&reg=48&relid=136750.

[26] Ministry of External Affairs. India-Iran Agreement on Chabahar Port[EB/OL]. (2016-07-21)[2026-10-01]. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?lang=2&reg=48&relid=147456.

[27] Ministry of Shipping. India takes over operations of part of Chabahar Port in Iran[EB/OL]. (2019-01-07)[2026-10-01]. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1558896.

[28] India Ports Global Limited. Request for Proposals (RFP) for Selection of Operator for Operation of Part of Shahid Beheshti Port at Chabahar, Phase I, Islamic Republic of Iran[R/OL]. (2018-04-03)[2026-10-01]. https://www.indianembassytehran.gov.in/public_files/assets/pdf/Request_for_Propo sal_Short_Term__March_28__Clean.pdf.