Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2020, 3(9); doi: 10.25236/FER.2020.030904.

Problems and Countermeasures in Badminton Teaching in Colleges and Universities

Author(s)

Xingmin Zhu

Corresponding Author:
Xingmin Zhu
Affiliation(s)

Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou Guangdong 510420, China

Abstract

In recent years, people from all walks of life pay great attention to physical education in colleges and universities. Many colleges and universities have adopted badminton teaching methods. Badminton education has many advantages, which can enhance the overall physical fitness of college students, and also enable them to achieve friendly communication in the learning process. However, there are some defects in the teaching process, which affect the overall effect of badminton teaching. Therefore, colleges and relevant physical education teachers must take effective strategies to further improve the teaching effect and improve the overall quality of badminton teaching. This article is mainly based on the problems and countermeasures in the course of college badminton teaching.

Keywords

College physical education, Badminton teaching, Existing problems, Effective strategies

Cite This Paper

Xingmin Zhu. Problems and Countermeasures in Badminton Teaching in Colleges and Universities. Frontiers in Educational Research (2020) Vol. 3 Issue 9: 13-16. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2020.030904.

References

[1] Zhu Dingyuan (2019). Problems and Countermeasures in College Badminton Teaching Process [J]. Sports World (Academic Edition), no.5, pp.12-13.

[2] Li Yingda (2016). Analysis of Problems Existing in the Course of Badminton Teaching in Universities and Countermeasures [J]. Talent, no.14, pp.171-172.

[3] Li Yingda (2015). Problems and Countermeasures in Badminton Teaching in Colleges and Universities [J]. Contemporary Sports Science and Technology, no.16, pp.59-60.

[4] Wen Ying (2017). The Implementation Strategy of Inquiry Teaching in College Badminton Courses [J]. Economic and Trade Practice, no.22, pp.341-342.