Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2020, 3(7); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2020.030716.

The Analysis of Illocutionary Acts and the Effects in the Debate on Trade Friction between the Hosts of China Global Television Network and Fox Business Channel

Author(s)

Liu Zhencong, Diao Huiying*

Corresponding Author:
Diao Huiying
Affiliation(s)

School of English Language, Culture and Literature, Beijing International Studies University, 100024, China
E-mail: [email protected]
*Corresponding Author

Abstract

The speech act theory was employed to analyze illocutionary acts in the debate on China-US trade friction between the host of China Global Television Network (CGTN) Liu Xin and the host of American Fox Business Channel Trish Regan. The result indicated that in Liu Xin’s turns, representatives were used eight times, directives and expressives twice respectively. In Trish’s turns, directives were used once, expressives three times with the absence of representatives. This result showed that the western countries are more powerful in media transmission and the right of speech, while the Eastern countries are in a weak position.

Keywords

Illocutionary acts, Debate on china-us trade friction, Speech act theory, Trade friction

Cite This Paper

Liu Zhencong, Diao Huiying. The Analysis of Illocutionary Acts and the Effects in the Debate on Trade Friction between the Hosts of China Global Television Network and Fox Business Channel. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2020) Vol. 3, Issue 7: 143-153. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2020.030716.

References

[1] J. Austin, Y. G. Gu (2002). How to do things with words. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
[2] Z. C. Liu, L. F. Yang (2006). Criticism of Speech Act Theory: Inheritance and Development, Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University, no.2, pp.25-31.
[3] J. R. Searle (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts, Language in society, vol.5, no.1, pp.1-23.
[4] J. Searle, S. J. Zhang (2001). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
[5] M. Y. Xiang (2018). Notes on Speech Act Theory, Modern Foreign Languages, vol.41, no.4, pp.541-549.
[6] S. S. Shao (2016). Studies on the Professionalism of the Usage of Trial Language from the Perspective of Speech Act Theory, Legal System and Society, no.22, pp.133-134.
[7] F. G. Liu, Y. R. Zhao (2017). The Analysis of China’s Diplomatic Principle of “Righteousness”-A Case Study of President Xi Jinping’s UN Speech, English Studies, no.1, pp.66-77.
[8] M. Ulum, D. Sutopo, W. Warsono (2018). A Comparison Between Trump’s and Clinton’s Commissive Speech Act in America’s Presidential Campaign Speech, English Education Journal, vol.8, no.2, pp.221-228.
[9] H. Nassaji (2015). Qualitative and Descriptive Research: Data Type Versus Data Analysis, Language Teaching Research, vol.19, no.2, pp.129-132.
[10] J. Y. Chen (2018). The Background, Causes, Essence and Countermeasures of Sino-Us Trade War, Wuhan University Journal, vol. 71, no.5, pp.72-81.