Frontiers in Educational Research, 2020, 3(10); doi: 10.25236/FER.2020.031018.
Liyan Zhaoa, *, Dongping Lib, Yanhui Wangc, Wenqiang Sund
a School of Education, Chengdu College of Arts and Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan 610401, China
b School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China
c School of Education Science, Jiaying University, Meizhou, Guangdong 514015, China
d School of Educational Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China
Adolescent delinquency is a serious social problem around the world. Understanding the risk factors associated with adolescent delinquency is an essential precondition of any effective prevention and intervention. This study investigated the unique relationship between different forms of parental control (behavioral control and psychological control) and adolescent delinquency, as well as the mediating role of deviant peer affiliation in the relationship between parental control and adolescent delinquency. Participants were 703 adolescents (mean age = 14.30 years, SD = 1.08) from three middle schools in central China. The Parental Behavioral and Psychological Control Scale, Deviant Peer Affiliation Questionnaire, and Adolescent Delinquency Scale were completed anonymously. By controlling for a series of variables like gender, age, socioeconomic status, and non-focal forms of parental control, it was found that psychological control was positively associated with adolescent delinquency. Moreover, deviant peer affiliation mediated the relationship between psychological control and adolescent delinquency. In contrast, although the association of behavioral control with adolescent delinquency was not significant, behavioral control significantly and negatively predicted deviant peer affiliation, which in turn was associated with adolescent delinquency (i.e. distal mediation). These findings suggest that different forms of parental control have differential associations with adolescent delinquency. Moreover, deviant peer affiliation is an important mediation mechanism underlying these relations. The practical implications of these findings were discussed.
delinquency, deviant peer affiliation, behavioral control, psychological control, adolescents
Liyan Zhao, Dongping Li, Yanhui Wang, Wenqiang Sun. Parental Control and Adolescents’ Delinquency: The Mediating Role of Deviant Peer Affiliation. Frontiers in Educational Research (2020) Vol. 3 Issue 10: 81-90. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2020.031018.
 Q. Dong and C.D. Lin (2011). Contemporary Chinese children and adolescents’ psychological development: Report of the national children’s study of China. Beijing: Science Press.
 M.A.J. Ezinga, F.M. Weerman, P.M. Westenberg, and C.C.J.H. Bijleveld (2008). Early adolescence and delinquency: Levels of psychosocial development and self-control as an explanation of misbehaviour and delinquency. Psychology, Crime & Law, vol.14, no.4, p.339-356.
 T. Moffitt (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behaviour: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, vol.100, no.4, p.674-701.
 R. Loeber and D.P. Farrington (2000). Young children who commit crime: Epidemiology, developmental origins, risk factors, early interventions, and policy implications. Development and Psychopathology, vol.12, no.4, p.737-762.
 S.H. Jeong and M.K. Eamon (2009). A model of family background, family process, youth self-control, and delinquent behavior in two-parent families. Journal of Family Social Work, vol.12, no.4, p.323-339.
 L.M. Broidy, D.S. Nagin, R.E. Tremblay, J.E. Bates, B. Brame, K.A. Dodge, et al. (2003). Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive behaviors and adolescent delinquency: A six-site, cross-national study. Developmental Psychology, vol.39, no.2, p.222-245.
 D. Harris-McKoy and M. Cui (2013). Parental control, adolescent delinquency, and young adult criminal behavior. Journal of Child and Family Studies, vol.22, no.6, p.836-843.
 D.L. Li, W. Zhang and Y.H. Wang (2015). Parental behavioral control, psychological control and Chinese adolescents’ peer victimization: The mediating role of self-control. Journal of Child and Family Studies, vol.24, no.3, p.628-637.
 B.K. Barber (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, vol.67, no.6, p.3296-3319.
 B.K. Barber, H.E. Stolz and J.A. Olsen (2005). Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: Assessing relevance across time, culture, and method. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, vol.70, no.4, p.1-137.
 R.A. De Kemp, R.H. Scholte, G. Overbeek and R.C. Engels (2006). Early adolescent delinquency: The role of parents and best friends. Criminal Justice and Behavior, vol.33, no.4, p.488-510.
 G.S. Pettit, R.D. Laird, K.A. Dodge, J.E. Bates and M.M. Criss (2001). Antecedents and behavior-problem outcomes of parental monitoring and psychological control in early adolescence. Child Development, vol.72, no.2, p.583-598.
 M. Pinquart (2017). Associations of parenting dimensions and styles with externalizing problems of children and adolescents: An updated meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, vol.53, no.5, p.873-932.
 M. Hoeve, J.S. Dubas, V.I. Eichelsheim, P.H. Van der Laan, W. Smeenk and J.R. Gerris (2009). The relationship between parenting and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, vol.37, no.6, p.749-775.
 G. Torrente and A.T. Vazsonyi (2008). Brief Report: The salience of the family in antisocial and delinquent behaviors among spanish adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, vol.169, no.2, p.187-198.
 B.B. Lahey, C.A. Van Hulle, B.M. D’Onofrio, J.L. Rodgers and I.D. Waldman (2008). Is parental knowledge of their adolescent offspring’s whereabouts and peer associations spuriously associated with offspring delinquency? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, vol.36, no.6, p.807-823.
 D.L. Li, W. Zhang, D.P. Li and Y.H. Wang (2012). Parental behavioral control, psychological control, and aggression and social withdrawal in early adolescents. Psychological Development and Education, vol.28, no.2, p.201-209.
 Q. Wang, E.M. Pomerantz and H.C. Chen (2007). The role of parents’ control in early adolescents’ psychological functioning: A longitudinal investigation in the United States and China. Child Development, vol.78, no.5, p.1592-1610.
 A.C. Fletcher, L. Steinberg and M. Williams-Wheeler (2004). Parental influences on adolescent problem behavior: Revisiting Stattin and Kerr. Child Development, vol.75, no.3, p.781-796.
 B. Soenens, M. Vansteenkiste, K. Luyckx and L. Goossens (2006). Parenting and adolescent problem behavior: An integrated model with adolescent self-disclosure and perceived parental knowledge as intervening variables. Developmental Psychology, vol.42, no.2, p.305-318.
 T. Hirschi (2002). Causes of delinquency. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
 B.J. Ye, Q. Yang and Z.Q. Hu (2012). The effect mechanism of parental control, deviant peers and sensation seeking on drug use among reform school students. Psychological Development and Education, vol.28, no.6, p.641-650.
 A. Bandura (1978). Social learning theory of aggression. Journal of Communication, vol.28, no.3, p.12-29.
 W.N. Bao, A. Haas and L. Tao (2017). Impact of Chinese parenting on adolescents’ social bonding, affiliation with delinquent peers, and delinquent behavior. Asian Journal of Criminology, vol.12, no.2, p.81-105.
 Z.Z Bao, D.P. Li, W. Zhang and Y.H. Wang (2015). School climate and delinquency among Chinese adolescents: Analyses of effortful control as a moderator and deviant peer affiliation as a mediator. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, vol.43, no.1, p.81-93.
 M.A. Straus (1990). Injury and frequency of assault and the “representative sample fallacy” in measuring wife beating and child abuse. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 75-91). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
 National Bureau of Statistics. (2012). Tabulation on the 2010 Population Census of the People’s Republic of China (BookI, BookII, Book III). Beijing: China Statistics Press.
 J.J. Song, D.P. Li, C.H. Gu, L.Y. Zhao, Z.Z. Bao and Y.H. Wang (2014). Parental control and adolescents’ problematic internet use: The mediating effect of deviant peer affiliation. Psychological Development and Education, vol.30, no.3, p.303-311.
 D.P. Li, X. Li, Y.H. Wang, L.Y. Zhao, Z.Z. Bao and F.F. Wen (2013). School connectedness and problematic Internet use in adolescents: A moderated mediation model of deviant peer affiliation and self-control. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, vol.41, no.8, p.1231-1242.
 D.P. Li, Y.Y. Zhou, L.Y. Zhao, Y.H. Wang and W.Q. Sun (2016). Cumulative ecological risk and adolescent internet addiction: The mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction and positive outcome expectancy. Acta Psychologica Sinica, vol.48, no.12, p.1-19.
 D.P. Li, D. He, W. Chen, Z.Z. Bao, Y.H. Wang and L.Y. Zhao (2015). School climate and adolescent problem behaviors: The mediating role of peer victimization. Journal of Psychological Science, vol.38, no.4, p.896-904.
 Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., and Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
 N.M. Razali and Y.B. Wah (2011). Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. Journal of statistical modeling and analytics, vol.2, no.1, p.21-33.
 D.M. Erceg-Hurn and V.M. Mirosevich (2008). Modern robust statistical methods: An easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist, vol.63, no.7, p.591-601.
 P.M. Podsakoff, S.B. MacKenzie, J.Y. Lee and N.P. Podsakoff (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.88, no.5, p.879-903.
 A.F. Hayes (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford.
 R.M. Baron and D.A. Kenny (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, vol.51, no.6, p.1173-1182.
 J. Fang, M.Q. Zhang and H.Z. Qiu (2012). Mediation analysis and effect size measurement: Retrospect and prospect. Psychological Development and Education, vol.28, no.1, p.105-111.
 B. Soenens, S. Park, M. Vansteenkiste and A. Mouratidis (2012). Perceived parental psychological control and adolescent depressive experiences: A cross-cultural study with Belgian and South-Korean adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, vol.35, no.2, p.261-272.
 M. Kerr, H. Stattin and W.J. Burk (2010). A reinterpretation of parental monitoring in longitudinal perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, vol.20, no.1, p.39-64.
 S. Kuppens, L.L. Laurent, M. Heyvaert and P. Onghena (2013). Associations between parental psychological control and relational aggression in children and adolescents: A multilevel and sequential meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, vol.49, no.9, p.1697-1712.
 R.M. Ryan and E.L. Deci (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, vol.55, no.1, p.68-78.
 S. Brehm and J.W. Brehm (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.
 B.B. Brown, J.P. Bakken, S.W. Ameringer and S.D. Mahon (2008). A comprehensive conceptualization of the peer influence process in adolescence. In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 17-44). New York: Guilford.
 B.K. Barber (2002). Reintroducing parental psychological control. In B. K. Barber (Ed.), Intrusive parenting: How psychological control affects children and adolescents (pp. 3-14). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
 T.P. Thornberry and M.D. Krohn (2000). The self-report method of measuring delinquency and crime. In Measurement and analysis of criminal justice. Criminal Justice 2000, vol. 4. (pp. 33-83) Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.
 D. Magnusson and H. Stattin (1998). Person-context interaction theories. In W. Damon & R.M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 685-759). New York: Wiley.