Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2020, 3(9); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2020.030914.

Research on efficiency and quality in the process of creative screening

Author(s)

Yubo Zhang*, Min Lin

Corresponding Author:
Yubo Zhang
Affiliation(s)

School of Innovation and Design, The Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts, Guangzhou, 510260, China
*Corresponding author

Abstract

Brainstorming is a common method to stimulate creativity, but it often ignores the cost of time and labor. Objective The purpose of this paper is to study the quality and efficiency of the four methods of brainstorming creative screening, and strive to explore a screening method that takes both into account. Methods collaborative filtering technology was used to eliminate not good ideas, while maintaining the collective consensus of all participants on good ideas. New screening strategies and methods were proposed and preliminarily verified. Each group was divided into three groups based on 50 different screening methods. Result The results show that the new design group takes the shortest screening time, the participants have the highest satisfaction with the process, and the screening quality is close to that of the negotiation group. Conclusion the new design can achieve a faster screening speed than the scoring method by reducing workload effectively. Meanwhile, the screening quality close to the negotiation method can be obtained by maintaining the consensus of the whole team, which achieves the purpose of both efficiency and quality.

Keywords

brainstorming; creative screening; information screening; collaborative filtering

Cite This Paper

Yubo Zhang, Min Lin. Research on efficiency and quality in the process of creative screening. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2020) Vol. 3, Issue 9: 120-131. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2020.030914.

References

[1] Osborn A. F. Creative Imagination [M]. China Invention&Creator Foundation, 1985, PP, 243-244.
[2] OSBORN A F. Applied Imagination[M]. China Inventors Foundation, 1985, pp, 243-244.
[3] MOULIN C, KAERI Y, SUGAWARA K, et al. Capitalization of Remote Collaborative Brainstorming Activities[J].Computer Standards & Interfaces, 2015.
[4] DIEHL M, STROEBE W. Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, pp, 497-509.
[5] PAULUS Paul B, ORTEGA Timothy S Larey & Anita H. Performance and Perceptions of Brainstormers in an Organizational Setting[J]. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1995.
[6] BARKI H, PINSONNEAULT A. Small Group Brainstorming and Idea Quality[J]. Small Group Research, 2001, 32(2):158-205.
[7] Feng Junhua. Introduction to Business Management [M]. Chemical Industry Press, 2006.
[8] FENG Jun-hua. Introduction to Enterprise Management[M]. Chemical Industry Press, 2006.
[9] Chen Shengpeng. Design and Research of Network Brainstorm Method based on the theoretical Model of innovation Generation [D].2015.
[10] CHEN Sheng-peng. The Design Research of Network Brainstorming Based on Theory Model of Innovation Generation[D]. 2015.
[11] Wang Guoping, Yan Li. Current Situation and Prospect of brainstorm research [J]. Journal of Suihua University, 2006(3):173-175.
[12] WANG Guo-ping, YAN Li. The Present Situation and Prospect of Brainstorming[J]. Journal of Suihua University, 2006(3):173-175.
[13] LAMM H, TROMMSDORFF G. Group Versus Individual Performance on Tasks Requiring Ideational Proficiency (Brainstorming): A Review[J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2010, 3(4):361-388.
[14] STALK G JR. The Next Source of Competitive Advantage[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1988, 66(6).
[15] DANEMAN M. Working Memory as a Predictor of Verbal Fluency[J]. Psycholinguist Res 20, 1991, pp, 445–464.
[16] DIEHL M ,  STROEBE W . Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, pp, 497-509.
[17] SHIH P C, VENOLIA G, OLSON G M. Brainstorming under Constraints: Why Software Developers Brainstorm in Groups[C]. Bcs Conference on Human-computer Interaction. British Computer Society,  2011.
[18] CLAYPHAN A, COLLINS A, ACJAD C, et al. Firestorm: A Brainstorming Application for Collaborative Group Work at Tabletops[C]. Acm International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces, 2011.
[19] BAWDEN D, HOLTHAM C, COURTNEY N. Perspectives on Information Overload[J]. Aslib Proceedings, 1999, 51(8):249-255.
[20] Kong Weiliang. Research on Key Issues of Collaborative Filtering Recommendation System [D]. Central China Normal University,2013.
[21] Kong Wei-liang. Research on the Key Problems of Collaborative Filtering Recommender System[D]. Central China Normal University, 2013.