Objective: To observe the effect of quality control in clinical immunoassay. Methods: 100 clinical immunoassay samples were selected for detection. Among them, 50 cases of immune test samples were tested by conventional test method, and the other 50 cases were tested by quality control method. After the immune test of the two groups of patients, the treatment effect of the two groups of patients were recorded and analyzed in detail. These 100 clinical immunoassay samples were selected from August 2019 to August 2020. Results: the treatment effect of patients who used quality control method for clinical immune test was much better than that of patients who used routine clinical immune test. Conclusion: compared with the conventional clinical immune test method, the quality control clinical immune test method is more scientific and reasonable, so the test method is worthy of promotion and use.

Rongfeng Sun. Observation on the Effect of Quality Control in Clinical Immunoassay. Frontiers in Medical Science Research (2020) Vol. 2 Issue 4: 54-57. https://doi.org/10.25236/FMSR.2020.020408.

[1] Li Haiyan (2020). Observation on the efficacy of quality control in clinical immunoassay [J]. Famous doctor, no.10, pp.158-159.
[2] Yue Lijuan (2019). Observation on the application effect of quality control in clinical immunoassay [J]. Henan Journal of preventive medicine, vol.30, no.10, pp. 815-816 + 818.
[3] Gu Liping (2018). Study on quality control of clinical immunoassay [J]. Contemporary medicine, vol.24, no.35, pp.108-109.
[4] Jia Zhaohua (2018). Observation on the application effect of strict quality control in clinical immunoassay [J]. China Minkang medicine, vol.30, no.12, pp. 92-93.
[5] Ma liming, Dong Qingli (2017). Observation on the effect of quality control in clinical immunoassay [J]. Clinical medicine research and practice, vol.2, no.29, pp. 99-100.
[6] Cai Lili (2016). Observation on the application effect of quality control in clinical immunoassay [J]. Chinese medical guide, vol.14, no.16, pp.27-28.