Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2020, 2(17); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2020.021719.

The Enlightenment of the Concept and Practice of Gifted Education in USA to the Development of Gifted Education in China: Perspective of School Education


TAN Shaofeng, WEI Jihua

Corresponding Author:
TAN Shaofeng

Guangxi College for Preschool Education, Nanning, Guangxi, 530022, China


Under the background of the increasing demand for high-ability talents, Gifted Education is the effective complement to school education as a concept of quality education. China needs the help of Gifted Education to realize the goal of building a strong country in human resources. School education is the most important part of the education system of China, its educational reform must be combined with the local reality to provide Gifted Education for Chinese students effectively. The schools and educators need to adhere to the ideas of “Gifted Development” and “Multi-oriented Gifted Education”, so as to draw on the experience of the reform and development of Gifted Education in the USA, to promote the organic integration of national policies, funds, social environment, curriculum system and the building of teachers, and attach importance to the interaction between students and environment, as well as the exertion of students’ subjective initiative, finally to provide rich and different education for all students in the whole school.


Gifted education, School education, Multi-orientation, Differentiation, Enlightenment

Cite This Paper

TAN Shaofeng, WEI Jihua. The Enlightenment of the Concept and Practice of Gifted Education in USA to the Development of Gifted Education in China: Perspective of School Education. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2020) Vol. 2 Issue 17: 117-126. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2020.021719.


[1] Allport, G. W (1937). Patterns and growth in personality, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
[2] Atkinson et al (2007). Addressing the STEM challenge by expanding specialty math and science high schools, NCSSSMST Journal, vol.12, no.2, pp.12-13.
[3] Barab, S. A., Plucker, J. A (2002). Smart people or smart context? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, no.37, pp.165-182.
[4] Berliner, D. C., Biddle, R. J (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud and the attach on America’s public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
[5] Bloom, B. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bio-ecological model. Psychological Review, no.101, pp.568-586.
[6] Carroll, J. B (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[7] Carroll, J, B (1997). Psychometrics, intelligence, and public perception. Intelligence, no.24, pp.25-52.
[8] Dai, D. Y. (in press). Giftedness in the making: A response to Ziegler and Phillipson (2012). High Ability Studies.
[9] Dai, D. Y (2010). The nature and nurture of giftedness: A new framework for understanding gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
[10] [10] Dai, D. Y (2011). Hopeless anarchy or saving pluralism? Reflections on our field in response to Ambrose, Van Tassel-Baska, Coleman, and Cross. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, no.34, pp.705-730.
[11] [11] Dai, D. Y., & Renzulli, J. S (2008). Snowflakes, living systems, and the mystery of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, no.52, pp.114-130.
[12] [12] Feldhusen, J. F (1986). A conception of giftedness, In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 127-127). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[13] Feldman, D. H (1988). Creativity: Dreams, insights and transformations. In R. J. Stemberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 271-297
[14] FU Y. P (2018). Policy and practice of Gifted Education in American high schools. Beijing. Science Press.
[15] Gardner, H (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
[16] Gardner, H (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
[17] Gardner, H (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons in theory and practice. New York. Basic Books.
[18] Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with the gifted child. New York: Wiley.
[19] Goleman, D (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
[20] Guilford, J. P (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist 5, pp.444-454.
[21] Guilford, J. P (1967). Nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Jacob K. Javits gifted and talented students education act of 2001[EB/OL]. http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg72.html, 2015-11-03.
[22] Jones, B M (2009). Profiles of state-supported residential math and science schools, Journal of Advanced Academies, Spring, vol.20, no.3, pp.12-13.
[23] Kelley, H. H (1973). The process of causal attribution. American psychologist, vol.28, no.2, pp.107-128.
[24] National Association for Gifted Children. 2008-2009 State of the nation in gifted education. [EB/OL]. http //www.nagc.org/index.aspx? id=1051. [2010-08-12].
[25] Shaughnessy M F (2002). A reflective conversation with Robert J. Sternberg about giftedness, gifted education, and intelligence [J]. Gifted Education International, no.16, pp.201-207.