Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2021, 4(1); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2021.040104.
Yang Dong
School of Law, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China
The widespread use of biometric information has motivated more litigations under BIPA, especially after the case of Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment. To give more specific protection of the citizens, the state should not just rely on the federal judgment decisions to give their opinionsm and make independent and concrete interpretations of the term “aggrieved”. The infringed party can get more substantial protection from the state justice while the legislation still seems to have a long way to go.
BIPA, Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment, biometric information
Yang Dong. Biometric Information Privacy Act: Statutes, Litigation, and Future. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2021) Vol. 4, Issue 1: 19-23. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2021.040104.
[1] Claudia Cuador, From Street Photography to Face Recognition: Distinguishing between the Right to Be Seen and the Right to Be Recognized, 41 Nova L. Rev. 237 (2017) (At common
[2] David J. Baldwin; Jennifer Penberthy Buckley; D. Ryan Slaugh, Insuring against Privacy Claims following a Data Breach, 122 Penn St. L. Rev. 683, 726 (2018).
[3] Daveante Jones, Protecting Biometric Information in Arkansas, 69 Ark. L. Rev. 117 (2016)
[4] J. Maria Glover, The Structural Role of Private Enforcement Mechanism in Public Law, 53 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1137, 1218 (2012).
[5] Daveante Jones, Protecting Biometric Information in Arkansas, 69 Ark. L. Rev. 117 (2016)
[6] Hannah Zimmerman, The Data of You: Regulating Private Industry's Collection of Biometric Information, 66 U. Kan. L. Rev. 637 (2018)