Academic Journal of Engineering and Technology Science, 2019, 2(1); doi: 10.25236/AJETS.020028.
Jun Ma, Jihong Yu* and Zaiyan Gong
School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
*Corresponding author e-mail: email@example.com
The development of BEV taxis in China is at an early stage. Operators and the government lack a suitable model selection strategy when facing so many BEV models. Therefore, this paper proposes a BEV taxi model selection method, which uses an improved EW-AHP comprehensive weighting method to empower the indicators, and uses the VIKOR multi-indicator decision-making method to evaluate the selected models. The case study shows that the method has high scientificity and practicability, and provides taxi operators with scientific theoretical guidance on BEV taxi selection.
BEV taxi, model selection, EW-AHP, VIKOR
Jun Ma, Jihong Yu and Zaiyan Gong, Research on BEV Taxi Model Selection. Academic Journal of Engineering and Technology Science (2019) Vol. 2: 157-167. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJETS.020028.
 Sun Yuyao, Song Xianhua. (1993) Comprehensive evaluation theory, model and application. Ningxia people's Publishing House
 Yang Zhan. (2009). Assessment study of saloon car production. (Doctoral dissertation, Shanghai Jiaotong University).
 Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, 2 (1), 5-21.
 Opricovic, S., and Tzeng, G. H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European journal of operational research, 178 (2), 514-529.
 Opricovic, S., and Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European journal of operational research, 156 (2), 445-455.
 Chu Ran, Wang Huaixiu, and Wang Yahui. (2018) Research on multi⁃criteria comprehensive evaluation based on entropy weight and grey relational legal weight for VIKOR. Modern Electronics Technique 41 (24), 172-176+179.
 Yang Baoan.(2008) Multi-objective decision analysis theory, method and application research. Donghua University Press.
 Jinwei, G., Xuqiang, P., Xiang, G., & Yongan, Z. (2014). Improved method on weights determination of indexes in multi-objective decision. Journal of Xidian University, 41 (6), 118-125.
 Ouyang, S., Liu, Z. W., Li, Q., and Shi, Y. L. (2013). A new improved entropy method and its application in power quality evaluation. In Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 706, pp. 1726-1733). Trans Tech Publications.
 Saaty, T. L., and Vargas, L. G. (2012). Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process (Vol. 175). Springer Science & Business Media.
 Sayadi, M. K., Heydari, M., and Shahanaghi, K. (2009). Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33 (5), 2257-2262.
 Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S. F.,and Yazdankhah, A. (2010). Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 37 (1), 24-30.
 Jahan, A., Mustapha, F., Ismail, M. Y., Sapuan, S. M., & Bahraminasab, M. (2011). A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Materials & Design, 32 (3), 1215-1221.