Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Medicine, 2021, 3(1); doi: 10.25236/IJFM.2021.030110.

Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy with Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy

Author(s)

Wanqian Zhang1, Xiangfu Wang2, Huihui Zheng1, Weiguo Chen2, Heng Zhao1, Xiangyu You1, Huanying Yang1, Gang Zheng1, Tingrui Sang1, Chao Zhang1

Corresponding Author:
Xiangfu Wang
Affiliation(s)

1 Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China 

2 Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China

Abstract

Purpose Objective to investigate the safety and clinical efficacy of posterior percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (PPECD) in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Method from January 2016 to December 2019, 35 cases of CSR were treated with PPECD. The degree of pain was evaluated by numeric rating scales (NRS) before operation, at discharge, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year after operation and at the last follow-up. The functional recovery was evaluated by neck disability index (NDI) and Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA). The clinical efficacy was evaluated by modified MacNab grading and MRI at the last follow-up. Result of the 35 patients, 16 males and 19 females were aged 39~78 years, with an average age of (54.0 ± 9.9) years. The operative segments were C4-5 9, C5-6 15 and C6-7 11. All 35 patients successfully completed the operation. The operation time was 60~90min, the average time was (75.0 ± 7.9) min, the bleeding volume was 10~22ml, the average (16.3 ± 3.1) ml, the postoperative hospitalization days were 4~12 days, and the average was (7.0 ± 1.6) days. All 35 patients were followed up for more than one year after operation, with an average follow-up of 26.7 months (13~53 months). The NRS index was significantly lower in each period than before operation (P < 0.01), NDI and JOA index were significantly lower than those before operation (P < 0.01). The clinical effect was evaluated at the last follow-up, 20 cases were excellent, 12 were good, 3 were fine, and the excellent rate was 91.4%. No complications such as nerve root injury, dural sac tear or infection occurred during the follow-up period, and no patients needed to receive secondary minimally invasive or open surgery for symptom recurrence. Conclusion Under the premise of strictly grasping the indications, the curative effect of PPECD in the treatment of CSR is confirmed, and the patients' satisfaction is high.

Keywords

Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, percutaneous posterior cervical endoscopy, discectomy, clinical efficacy

Cite This Paper

Wanqian Zhang, Xiangfu Wang, Huihui Zheng, Weiguo Chen, Heng Zhao, Xiangyu You, Huanying Yang, Gang Zheng, Tingrui Sang, Chao Zhang. Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy with Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy. International Journal of Frontiers in Medicine (2021), Vol. 3, Issue 1: 48-55. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFM.2021.030110.

References

[1] Chen EL, Wang N, Quan RF. [Comparison of clinical effects of two anterior cervical decompression with fusion on treating two segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy]. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2020 Sep 25;33(9):841-7.

[2]Oliver JD, Goncalves S, Kerezoudis P, et al. Comparison of Outcomes for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With and Without Anterior Plate Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Apr 1;43(7):E413-E422.

[3] Yang J, Liu P, Liu T, et al. [Effect of zero-profile and self-locking intervertebral cage and plate-cage construct on maintenance of cervical curvature after anterior cervical surgery]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 15;34(2):151-156. 

[4] Yang X, Donk R, Arts MP, et al. Maintaining range of motion after cervical discectomy does not prevent adjacent segment degeneration.Spine J. 2019 Nov;19(11):1816-1823.

[5] Ma X, Du Y, Wang S, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration after intervertebral fusion surgery by means of cervical block vertebrae. Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1401-1407. 

[6] Quillo-Olvera J, Lin GX, Kim JS. Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy: a technical review. Ann Transl Med. 2018 Mar;6(6):100. 

[7] Quillo-Olvera J, Lin GX, Kim JS. Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy: a technical review. Ann Transl Med. 2018 Mar;6(6):100.

[8] Lin T, Wang Z, Chen G, et al. Predictive Effect of Cervical Sagittal Parameters on Conservative Treatment of Single-Segment Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy. World Neurosurg. 2020 Feb; 134:e1028-e1036.

[9] Oh JK, Hong JT, Kang DH, et al. Epidemiology of C5 Palsy after Cervical Spine Surgery: A 21-Center Study. Neurospine. 2019 Sep;16(3):558-562.

[10] Chen YC, Wu JC, Chang HK, et al. Early Discharge for Anterior Cervical Fusion Surgery: Prediction of Readmission and Special Considerations for Older Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 21;16(4):641.

[11] Hah RJ, Alluri R, Anderson PA. Biomechanical Analysis of an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Pseudarthrosis Model Revised With Machined Interfacet Allograft Spacers. Global Spine J. 2020 Dec;10(8):973-981.

[12] Zheng C, Huang X, Yu J, et al. Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Diskectomy: A Single-Center Experience of 252 Cases. World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e63-e67.

[13] Wen Z, Lu T, Wang Y, et al. Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Titanium Mesh Cages for Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Pathologies: A Literature Review. Med Sci Monit. 2018 Sep 12;24:6398-6404.

[14] Lee JH, Lee SH. Clinical and radiographic changes after percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy: a long-term follow-up. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014 Dec;32(12):663-8.

[15] Liu C, Liu K, Chu L, et al. Posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy through lamina-hole approach for cervical intervertebral disc herniation. Int J Neurosci. 2019 Jul; 129(7):627-634.

[16] Yang JS, Chu L, Chen L, et al. Anterior or posterior approach of full-endoscopic cervical discectomy for cervical intervertebral disc herniation? A comparative cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Oct 1;39(21):1743-50.

[17] Zheng C, Huang X, Yu J, et al. Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Diskectomy: A Single-Center Experience of 252 Cases. World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e63-e67.

[18] Kim CH, Shin KH, Chung CK, et al. Changes in cervical sagittal alignment after single-level posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical diskectomy. Global Spine J. 2015 Feb;5(1):31-8.

[19] Lee DH, Cho JH, Hwang CJ, et al. Multilevel posterior foraminotomy with laminoplasty versus laminoplasty alone for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with radiculopathy: a comparative study. Spine J. 2018 Mar; 18(3):414-421.

[20] Wu W, Yan Z. Intraoperative total spinal anesthesia as a complication of posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy. Eur Spine J. 2018 Jul; 27(Suppl 3):431-435.