Department of Ethnology, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100000, China
This study examined the effect of reading for discussion model (RfD model) on the incidental vocabulary acquisition (IVA) in comparison with a more the traditional teaching model. The 84 college students were then recruited as participants and were divided into two groups (42 vs. 42) which were designated as the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group was received with the RfD model teaching practices, while the control class underwent a more the traditional teaching model which was commonly practiced in the setting of college English teaching in China. After the experiment, all the students were tested two times (i.e., immediately after the class, and 15 days later) with vocabulary knowledge test (VKT). The data of VKTs analyzed by software SPSS16.0. The results indicated that, although the experimental and control groups achieved quite approximate outcomes in the immediate test of IVA, the experimental group performed much better than the control group. The advantage of the RfD model over the traditional model is that the RfD model gives more benefits on the long-term vocabulary retention. Therefore, as a novel English teaching model, the RfD model will make a great influence on English vocabulary teaching and learning. However, there were a few limitations for this study, so the further study should be conducted from other aspects to verify the effectiveness of RfD model.
the RfD model, the traditional teaching model, IVA
Qin Xu. The Effect of Reading for Discussion Model on Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2021) Vol. 4, Issue 4: 71-81. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2021.040416.
 Al-Hejin, B. (2004). Attention and awareness: evidence from cognitive and second language acquisition Research. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 4, 1-22.
 Atkinson, D. (2011). Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Routledge.
 Brown, H. D. (2002). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
 Coady, J. & Huckin, J. (2001). Second Language vocabulary acquisition. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
 DeKeyser, R. M. (2014). Age effects in second language learning. In S. Gass & A. Mackey. The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition[C]. London & New York: Routledge. 442-460.
 Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner Uptake in Communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51(2), 281-318.
 Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Ed.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 175-199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
 Harmer, J. (2000). How to Teach English. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
 Hatch, E. & C. Brown. (2001) Vocabulary, Semantics and Language Education. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
 Hulstijn. (2003). Incidental and Intentional Learning. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition.
 Izumi, S. (2002). Output, Input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: an experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.
 Izumi, S. & Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 34 (2), 239-278.
 Jakonen, T. & Morton, T. (2015). Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36(1): 73-94.
 Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Sociocultural theory and second language development: State-of-the-art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1): 67-109.
 Laufer, B. & Hulstijin, J. H. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics (22): 1-26.
 Laufer, B. (1990). Sequence and order in the development of L2 lexis: Some evidence form lexical confusions. Applied Linguistics, 11,281-296.
 Laufer, B. & Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition in a Second Language: The Construct of Task-induced Involvement. Applied Linguistics, 2001 (1): 1-26.
 Min, H. T. (2008). EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention: Reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities and narrow reading. Language Learning, 58, 73-115.
 Nunan, D. (2001). The Learner-Centered Curriculum: A Study in Second Language Teaching. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
 Pellicer Sanchez. (2016). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading: An Eye-tracking study[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (38): 97-130.
 Plowman, B. (2003). The difference in vocabulary acquisition for grade one students using Shared reading or guided reading. Retrieved August 9, 2013 from university of windsorhttp://scholar,uwindsor.ca/etd.
 Richard, J. (2003). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly,10(1),77-89.
 Robinson, P. (1995). Review article: attention, memory, and the noticing hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283-331.
 Rott, S. (2015). The Effect of Exposure Frequency on Intermediate Language Learners’ Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention through Reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 589-619.
 Tarone, E. (2015). Second language acquisition in applied linguistics: 1925-2015 and beyond. Applied Linguistics (4):444-453.
 Tricia Hedge. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 Tsui, A. B. M. & Tollefson, J. W. (2007). Language policy and the construction of national cultural identity. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (18): 1-21.
 VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: an update. Language Learning, 52, 755-803.
 Vidal, K. (2003). Academic listening: A source of vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 56-89.
 Wu Shiyu, Huang Shaoqiang (2018). College English Teaching, Why Stick To “Reading and Discussion? Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, (2), 9-14.