Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2021, 4(5); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2021.040506.
Yang Li
College of Foreign Languages, Hefei University of Technology, Anhui Province, China
This article is an analytical review of Samuel Beckett's supreme representation of the absurd, Waiting for Godot, which aims mainly at stressing Schopenhauer’s presence in this work from two aspects: the aesthetic idea and pessimism. In Schopenhauerian aesthetics, one way to recognize thing-in-itself is to get rid of time, space, and causality, which is a noticeable characteristic in Waiting for Godot, and the suffering of life, the core of Schopenhauer's pessimism, is also an essential element in this play. This paper will attempt to interpret Waiting for Godot from these two perspectives, which might help to illuminate how Schopenhauer's ideas have influenced Samuel Beckett in his early works.
Arthur Schopenhauer; Samuel Beckett; Waiting for Godot; Absurd; Pessimism
Yang Li. Interpreting Waiting for Godot from a Schopenhauerian View. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2021) Vol. 4, Issue 5: 26-32. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2021.040506.
[1] Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Representation Volume1. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[2] Beckett, Samuel. Waiting for Godot: A Tragicomedy in Two Acts. Grove Press, 2011.
[3] Pothast, Ulrich. The Metaphysical Vision: Arthur Schopenhauer's Philosophy of Art and Life and Samuel Beckett's Own Way to Make Use of it. Peter Lang, 2008.
[4] Esslin, Martin. The Theatre of the Absurd. Vintage ebooks, 2001.
[5] Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Representation, Vol.2. Courier Dover Publications, 2012.
[6] Zhang Yan. Waiting for Godot: A Parable and Somber Song on the Spirit Predicament of Modern People. Nanjing: HUNDRED SCHOOLS IN ARTS, 2010.
[7] Hussain, Tazir. Theatre of Absurd and Samuel Beckett’s “Waiting for Godot” as an Absurd Drama. International Journal of Science and (2012): 1470-1480.