Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2021, 3(15); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2021.031520.

Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Nonlinear Wiener Process-Based Degradation Model with Fusing Failure Data Time

Author(s)

Fengfei Wang, Liang Li and Hui Ye

Corresponding Author:
Liang Li
Affiliation(s)

High-Tech Institute of Xi’an, Xi’an, Shaanxi, PR China

Abstract

Aiming at the imperfection of historical degradation data for equipment, a remaining useful life (RUL) prediction method with fusing failure time data is proposed. Firstly, the nonlinear Wiener process-based degradation mode is used to model the degradation process of equipment. Then, based on the failure time data of congeneric equipment, the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm is used to estimate the unknown parameters in the model, in which the fixed parameters are calculated based on the field degradation data of the evaluated equipment. Finally, the degradation data of lithium-ion batteries are used to verify the proposed RUL prediction method. The experimental results show that for degradation data of equipment with imperfect prior information, the RUL prediction method with fusing failure time data is better than the traditional RUL prediction method.

Keywords

Fusing failure time data, Remaining useful life prediction, Parameter estimation, Wiener process, Nonlinear

Cite This Paper

Fengfei Wang, Liang Li and Hui Ye. Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Nonlinear Wiener Process-Based Degradation Model with Fusing Failure Data Time. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2021), Vol. 3, Issue 15: 159-164. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2021.031520.

References

[1] Mazhar M I, Kara S, Kaebernick H. Remaining life estimation of used components in consumer products: Life cycle data analysis by Weibull and artificial neural networks [J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25(6):1184-1193.

[2] Pecht. M G, Kang. M. Front Matter [M]//Pecht M G, Kang M. Prognostics and Health Management of Electronics. Piscataway, New Jersey, USA; IEEE PRESS. 2018: i-lviii.

[3] Ji S, Han X, Hou Y, et al. Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Airplane Engine Based on PCA-BLSTM [J]. Sensors (Basel), 2020, 20(16).

[4] Jouin M, Gouriveau R, Hissel D, et al. Degradations analysis and aging modeling for health assessment and prognostics of PEMFC[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2016, 148:78-95.

[5] Si X-S, Wang W, Hu C-H, et al. A Wiener-process-based degradation model with a recursive filter algorithm for remaining useful life estimation [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2013, 35(1-2):219-237.

[6] Han X, Wang Z, Xie M, et al. Remaining useful life prediction and predictive maintenance strategies for multi-state manufacturing systems considering functional dependence[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2021, 210:107560.

[7] Wang H, Liao H, Ma X, et al. Remaining useful life prediction and optimal maintenance time determination for a single unit using isotonic regression and Gamma process model[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2021, 210:107504.

[8] Zhang J-X, Hu C-H, He X, et al. A Novel Lifetime Estimation Method for Two-Phase Degrading Systems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2019, 68(2):689-709.

[9] Tang S, Guo X, Zhou Z. Mis-specification analysis of linear Wiener process–based degradation models for the remaining useful life estimation [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 2014, 228(5):478-487.

[10] Ungurean L, Cârstoiu G, Micea M V, et al. Battery state of health estimation: a structured review of models, methods and commercial devices [J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2017, 41(2): n/a-n/a.

[11] Si X S, Wang W B, Hu C H, et al. Remaining Useful Life Estimation Based on a Nonlinear Diffusion Degradation Process [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2012, 61(1):50-67.

[12] Tang S, Yu C, Wang X, et al. Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on the Wiener Process with Measurement Error [J]. Energies, 2014, 7(2):520-547.

[13] Gebraeel N, Elwany A, Pan J. Residual Life Predictions in the Absence of Prior Degradation Knowledge [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2009, 58(1):106-117.

[14] Zhiliang F, Guangbin L, Si X-S, et al. Degradation data-drive approach for remaining useful life estimation [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 24:173-182.

[15] Peng C Y, Tseng S T. Mis-Specification Analysis of Linear Degradation Models [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2009, 58(3):444-455.

[16] Tang S, Xu X, Yu C, et al. Remaining Useful Life Prediction With Fusing Failure Time Data and Field Degradation Data With Random Effects[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8:11964-11978.

[17] Huang Z, Xu Z, Wang W, et al. Remaining Useful Life Prediction for a Nonlinear Heterogeneous Wiener Process Model With an Adaptive Drift[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2015, 64(2):687-700.

[18] Jin G, Matthews D E, Zhou Z. A Bayesian framework for on-line degradation assessment and residual life prediction of secondary batteries in spacecraft [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2013, 113:7-20.