Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Medical Science Research, 2021, 3(5); doi: 10.25236/FMSR.2021.030509.

Clinical observation of modified greater trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasia in adults with high dislocation

Author(s)

Pengfei Han1, Weiwei Pei1, Su Yang2, Xiyong Li2, Changying Sun1, Jianmin Niu1

Corresponding Author:
Jianmin Niu
Affiliation(s)

1Department of Orthopaedics, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, China

2Department of Graduate School, Graduate Student Department of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, China

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the feasibility, perioperative complications and early follow-up effect of modified greater trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of severe hip dysplasia in adults with high dislocation. Methods: a retrospective analysis in January 2017 - June 2020, the modified sliding femoral greater trochanter osteotomy combined proximal femoral prosthesis handle fixed type of bone cement type and biological acetabulum prosthesis for 14 cases of 15 adult hip dysplasia hips high dislocation severe deformity of patients with primary total hip replacement, 1 case of bilateral, an average follow-up of 18.267±8.876 months. Preoperative X-ray films showed that all patients had unequal length of both lower limbs, small and shallow acetabular development, obvious anterior wall defect, small amount of bone in the acetabular wall, increased femoral neck dry angle and anterior inclination angle, and small and irregular medullary cavity, etc. Clinical and imaging evaluations were conducted for hip joint function, unequal length of both lower limbs, postoperative complications and prosthesis survival rate after surgery. Results: As of the last follow-up, all the patients showed significant improvement in walking ability and pain symptoms after surgery. All the 14 patients with Trendelenburg sign were positive before surgery and all the 15 hips were negative after surgery. All Ⅰ healing of incision, cut extremities were osseous healing. Before surgery, Harris score was (43.47±7.10) points, and 3 months after surgery, Harris score improved to (87.73±4.23) points, with statistically significant difference (t =-24.16, P < 0.001).The unequal length of both lower extremities before surgery was (3.94±0.88) cm, and the unequal length of both lower extremities was (0.49±0.24) cm 1 day after surgery, the difference was statistically significant (t =15.30, P < 0.001).The WOMAC score was (110.33±7.91) points before surgery, and improved to (61.53±16.77) points 3 months after surgery, with statistically significant difference (t =14.13, P < 0.001). VAS score before surgery was (6.73±1.44) points, and VAS score 3 days after surgery decreased to (1.87±0.92) points, with statistically significant difference (t =17.78, P < 0.001). Conclusion: modified sliding femoral greater trochanter osteotomy restored in the hip muscle tone, before the reconstruction of the lateral femoral physiological eccentricity and inclination, restored the relative length and lower limb soft tissue tension, reduce the risk of cutting after bone fracture healing, the femoral handle initial stability is good, treatment is one of the effective operation of high dislocation of adult hip dysplasia.

Keywords

Total hip arthroplasty; Adult hip dysplasia; Slip osteotomy

Cite This Paper

Pengfei Han, Weiwei Pei, Su Yang, Xiyong Li, Changying Sun, Jianmin Niu. Clinical observation of modified greater trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasia in adults with high dislocation. Frontiers in Medical Science Research (2021) Vol. 3 Issue 5: 53-61. https://doi.org/10.25236/FMSR.2021.030509.

References

[1] Greber E M , Pelt C E , Gililland J M, et al. Challenges in Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Setting of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip[J]. J Arthroplasty,2017, 32(9S): S38–S44. 

[2] Hareendranathan A R, Zonoobi D, Mabee M, et al. Hip segmentation from MRI volumes in infants for DDH diagnosis and treatment planning[J]. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2016, 17(6): 1046-1049.

[3] Alassaf N. Treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) between the age of 18 and 24 months[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2020, 30(4): 637-641. 

[4] Li H, Yuan Y, Xu J, et al. Direct Leverage for Reducing the Femoral Head in Total Hip Arthroplasty Without Femoral Shortening Osteotomy for Crowe Type 3 to 4 Dysplasia of the Hip[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(3):794-799.

[5] Wang J, Cai L, Xie L, et al. 3D printing-based Ganz approach for treatment of femoral head fractures: a prospective analysis[J]. J Orthop Surg Res,2019, 14(1):338. 

[6] Steffann F, Prudhon J L, Puch J M, et al. Trans trochanteric approach with coronal osteotomy of the great trochanter: A new technique for extra-capsular trochanteric fracture patients treated by total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly[J]. SICOT J, 2015, 12(8): 131-139.

[7] Tang-Jensen M, Kjærsgaard-Andersen P, Poulsen T K, et al. Survival and revision causes of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and the Mitch proximal epiphyseal replacement: results from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register[J]. Acta Orthop,2019, 90(6): 523-529. 

[8] Ferreira M L, de Luca K. Spinal pain and its impact on older people[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol,2017, 31(2): 192-202. 

[9] Shi X T, Li C F, Han Y, et al. Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe Type IV Hip Dysplasia: Surgical Techniques and Postoperative Complications[J]. Orthop Surg. 2019, 11(6):966-973. 

[10] Nakanowatari T, Suzukamo Y, Izumi SI. The Effectiveness of Specific Exercise Approach or Modifiable Heel Lift in the Treatment of Functional Leg Length Discrepancy in Early Post-surgery Inpatients after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a PROBE design[J]. Phys Ther Res,2016, 19(1):39-49. 

[11] Quan K, Mei J. Research progress of hip preserving surgery for femoral head necrosis [J]. Surg Res and New Tech 2016, 5 (4): 277-280.

[12] Zhu J, Li Y, Chen K, et al. Iliopsoas tendonitis following total hip replacement in highly dysplastic hips: a retrospective study[J]. J Orthop Surg Res,2019 , 14(1):145.

[13] Grappiolo G, La Camera F, Della Rocca A, et al. Total hip arthroplasty with a monoblock conical stem and subtrochanteric transverse shortening osteotomy in Crowe type IV dysplastic hips[J]. Int Orthop,2019, 43(1):77-83. 

[14] Denny H R, Linnell M, Maddox T W, et al. Canine total hip replacement using a cementless threaded cup and stem: a review of 55 cases[J]. J Small Anim Pract,2018, 59(6):350-356. 

[15] Beck M, Krüger A, Katthagen C, et al. Osteotomy of the greater trochanter: effect on gluteus medius function[J]. Surg Radiol Anat,2015, 37(6):599-607. 

[16] Luo Z, Chen M, Hu F, et al. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with extended sliding trochanteric osteotomy for high congenital hip dislocation: A retrospective study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2017, 96(14):e6581.

[17] Takao M, Nishii T, Sakai T, et al. Postoperative Limb-Offset Discrepancy Notably Affects Soft-Tissue Tension in Total Hip Arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2016, 98(18):1548-1554. 

[18] Chen M, Luo Z, Zhu C, et al. A Reliable Femoral Osteotomy in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Hartofilakidis Type C Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Proximal Femoral Reconstruction[J]. J Arthroplasty,2019, 34(6):1162-1167. 

[19] Dobbe J G G, Strackee S D, Streekstra G J. Minimizing the Translation Error in the Application of an Oblique Single-Cut Rotation Osteotomy: Where to Cut?[J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng,2018, 65(4):821-827.

[20] Haversath M, Busch A, Jäger M, et al. The 'critical trochanter angle': a predictor for stem alignment in total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Orthop Surg Res,2019, 14(1):165. 

[21] Wang J, Xu R, Kang X, et al. USE OF SMARTPHONE IN ACETABULAR COMPONENT ANGLE MEASUREMENT DURING TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY [J]. Chinese J. reparative Reconstr. Surg,2016, 30(9):1061-1064. 

[22] Yin S, Zhong H, Li R, et al. [Effectiveness of autologous femoral head bone graft in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type Ⅲ developmental dysplasia of hip with acetabular bone defect][J]. Chinese J. reparative Reconstr. Surg,2018, 32(1):20-24. 

[23] Feng W, Chen J, Wu K, et al. A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2019, 20(1):298. 

[24] Erickson J B, Samora W P, Klingele K E. Treatment of chronic, stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis via surgical hip dislocation with combined osteochondroplasty and Imhauser osteotomy[J]. J Child Orthop,2017, 11(4):284-288. 

[25] Kwon K S, Wang S I, Lee J H, et al. Effect of greater trochanteric epiphysiodesis after femoral varus osteotomy for lateral pillar classification B and B/C border Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease: A retrospective observational study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2017, 96(31):e7723. 

[26] Russell R D, Huo M H, Rodrigues D C, et al. Stem geometry changes initial femoral fixation stability of a revised press-fit hip prosthesis: A finite element study[J]. Technol Health Care,2016, 24(6):865-872.

[27] Thompson G, Pearson J F. No attributable effects of PRP on greater trochanteric pain syndrome[J]. N Z Med J,2019, 132(1507):22-32.