In the theory of social cognitive hierarchy, topic detection is an important part of research. It can provide readers with more information and enable them to obtain a better cognitive experience. The subject detection tasks in the field of library and information in our country are constantly developing, and great achievements have been made. In order to improve the efficiency of subject detection in the field of library and information, this paper proposes a subject detection method under the perspective of social cognitive level. This article mainly uses statistical analysis and survey methods to analyze the key factors of subject detection. The experimental results show that the reasonableness score of the four factors proposed in this paper is about 15 points on average. This shows that the factors studied in this article are closely related to topic detection.

Hui Wang. Subject Exploration in the Field of Library and Information from the Perspective of the Theory of Social Cognition. International Journal of Frontiers in Engineering Technology (2021), Vol. 3, Issue 10: 78-83. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFET.2021.031010.

[1] Lu Quan, Tian Min, Chen Jing. A Survey of Cognitive Load Measurement Research in the Library and Information Field[J]. Journal of Information Resources Management, 2018, 000(004): 98-105.

[2] Jin Zelong. Research on Gender Differences in Entrepreneurship Choice from the Perspective of Social Cognitive Career Theory[J]. Guangzhou Vocational Education Forum, 2018, 017(001):59-65,70.

[3] Shen Yufei, Xu Yang. A Comparative Study of Foreign Information System and Information Science in the 21st Century [J]. Library, Information and Knowledge, 2017, 000(002): 49-59.

[4] Lu Wanhui, Tan Zongying. Research on the Novelty Measurement Method of Academic Achievement Subject——Based on Doc2Vec and HMM Algorithm [J]. Modern Library and Information Technology, 2018, 002(003): 22-29.

[5] Zhao Yue, Xiao Xiantao. Research on the Zero Citation Phenomenon in the Library and Information Field Based on Subject Factor Analysis [J]. China Science and Technology Journal Research, 2017, 28(07): 641-646.

[6] Xu Dan, Xu Shuang, Chen Sisi, et al. Comparative analysis of topic lexicon and natural language method for detecting novelty of literature topics[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information, 2019, 028(001):19-26.

[7] Ji-Hong, Park, Ji-Young, et al. The Research Collaboration Pattern of Library and Information Science Field in Korea-Application of Collaboration Indices -[J]. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 2017, 48 (1):191-206.

[8] Corsello S M, Bittker J A, Liu Z, et al. The Drug Repurposing Hub: a next-generation drug library and information resource[J]. Nature Medicine, 2017, 23(4):405-408.

[9] D Bawden. Library and information science research[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2018, 61(2):209–212.

[10] Figuerola C G, Marco F, Pinto M. Mapping the evolution of library and information science (1978–2014) using topic modeling on LISA[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(12):1507-1535.

[11] Chang Y W. Exploring the interdisciplinary characteristics of library and information science (LIS) from the perspective of interdisciplinary LIS authors[J]. Library & Information Science Research, 2018, 40(2):125-134.

[12] Mathiesen K. Informational Justice: A Conceptual Framework for Social Justice in Library and Information Services[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2017, 64(2):198-225.