We construct a global higher education quality evaluation system by using the grey relation analysis method optimized based on the TOPSIS method. According to the data, we obtained the normalized original data matrix and found the optimal and worst solutions. Then we respectively calculated the distance between each evaluation object and the optimal and worst solutions, and obtained the relative closeness of each evaluation object to the optimal solution, as the basis for evaluation. Then we used the gray correlation analysis method. According to the degree of similarity or difference in the development trend between the factors, as another way of measuring the degree of correlation between the factors, we used the combined evaluation method, combining the AHP and the coefficient of variation method. The subjective and objective data are combined to get a more reasonable weight. According to the model, the country can effectively analyze the existing problems. By weighting each indicator, countries can identify major and minor problems and then develop refined solutions.

Jiayu Feng. Research on the Evaluation Model of the Health of the Higher Education System Based on EWM and FCE. Frontiers in Educational Research (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 3: 40-44. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2022.050308.

[1] Haochang Yang, Hui Ge, Faming Zhang. Discussion on the construction of evaluation index system for high-quality development of higher education. Journal of Educational Development. 2020(10),83-90.

[2] Zhongjing Huang, Lining Tang, Jie Wu, Lan Shi, Jinglin Jin, Yiyun Gu. How is the quality of education measured? Analysis based on OECD education indicators. China Education Policy Review. 2018,85-115.

[3] Yunxue Liu, Zhaorong Fan, Yanxin Gu, Changwei Xu, Wanyang Niu. Research on Evaluation System of Postgraduate Education Quality Based on Degree Type. University Education. 2020(02), 53-55.

[4] Hongchun Zhu, An Empirical Study of the Development of Tertiary Education on the Structure of Tertiary Education Expenditure[K]. 2019.

[5] Zhang Ting, Bao Jianhua, Zhu Jiaming, Wang Bo. Evaluation of undergraduate education quality in Jiangsu Province Based on fuzzy comprehensive method and grey relational analysis [J]. Journal of the science of Normal University, 2019,39 (02): 21-25

[6] Gao Yuqin, Chen Jiahui, Wang Dongdong, Zhang Zhenxing, Zhao Chencheng. Comprehensive evaluation system and application of low impact development measures in sponge City [J/OL]. Water resources protection: 1-10 [2021-02-09] http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1356.TV.20210125.1455.015. html.

[7] Meng Lihong, Wei Xuemei, Wu Shaoxiong, Wang Qingyun. Dynamic evaluation of water resources carrying capacity in Ganzhou City Based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model [J/OL]. Practice and understanding of Mathematics: 1-10 [2021-02-09] http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2018.O1.20210205. 1628.004.html.

[8] Yang Hao Chang, Ge Hui, Zhang Fan. Discussion on the construction of evaluation index system for high-quality development of Higher Education [J]. Education guide, 2020 (10): 83-90

[9] Huang Zhongjing, Tang lining, Wu Jie, Shi LAN, Jin Jinglin, Gu Yiyun. How to evaluate the quality of education? – an analysis based on OECD Education Indicators [J]. China education policy review, 2018 (00): 85-115

[10] Zhu Hongchun. The impact of higher education development on the expenditure structure of Higher Education [D]. Chongqing University of Posts and telecommunications, 2019