Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2019, 2(5); doi: 10.25236/FER.034045.

The Validity and Remedy of the Pathological International Commercial Arbitration Agreement

Author(s)

Jiangtao Qian1, Liang Guo2

Corresponding Author:
Jiangtao Qian
Affiliation(s)

International Law School of Northwest University of Political Science and Law, xi’an 710000, China

Abstract

The international commercial arbitration system has many advantages, such as respecting party autonomy, flexibility and simplicity, and is favored by the parties in the field of commercial contract disputes in practice. An effective and enforceable arbitration agreement is the basis for the smooth conduct of the arbitration proceedings. In fact, in daily international commercial practice, there are usually arbitration agreements that do not meet standards. Some of these arbitration agreements lack the necessary effective elements, so that this type of arbitration agreement is considered to be null and void, while some just lack of enforceability, which is regarded as pathological arbitration agreement. In practice, however, it is complex to identify the pathological agreement and make a distinction between it and other international commercial agreements. Only through analyzing and summarizing the elements of pathological arbitration agreement can we better discuss the remedy methods of it and finally approach such kind of disputes.

Keywords

pathological arbitration agreement; New York Convention; validity; remedy

Cite This Paper

Jiangtao Qian, Liang Guo. The Validity and Remedy of the Pathological International Commercial Arbitration Agreement. Frontiers in Educational Research (2019) Vol. 2 Issue 5: 109-119. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.034045.

References

[1]“Denotes arbitration agreements, and particularly arbitration clauses, which contains a defect or defects liable to disrupt the smooth progress of arbitration .” see Benjamin G. Davis, “Pathological Clause: Frédéric Eisemann’s Still Vital Criteria”, Arbitration International, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1991, pp. 356.
[2] Chen Zhidong(1998). International Commercial Arbitration Law, Law Press, No. 1, pp. 117.
[3] Huang Jin, Song Lianbin, Xu Qianquan(2007). Arbitration Law, China University of Political Science and Law Press, No. 3, pp. 100.
[4] Song Lianbin(2000). A Study of Jurisdictional Problems in International Commercial Arbitration, Law Press.
[5] Liu Xiangshu(2001). A Jurisprudential Study on the International Commercial Arbitral Award System of China, Law Press.
[6] Clive M(1993). Schmitthoff, Select Essays on International Trade Law, (Zhao Xiuwen translated) Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.