Frontiers in Educational Research, 2022, 5(6); doi: 10.25236/FER.2022.050613.
Qin Yuan1,2, John Archibald2
1Center for Applied Language and Cultural Studies, University of Sanya, Sanya, China
2Department of Linguistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
Many studies have shown that the High Variability Phonetic Training method can help L2 learners acquire nonnative phoneme contrasts. However, few studies have explored how this paradigm can work using modified input. We investigate L1 Mandarin learners of English as a foreign language and their perception of the tense/lax [i]/[ɪ] contrast. Mandarin learners rely on durational (rather than spectral) cues to distinguish these L2 vowels. In an ABX discrimination task, the experimental group was trained using both natural and synthesized stimuli whose vowels had been systematically lengthened or shortened thus removing the reliability of the durational cue. The control group was trained using natural stimuli only. The pre- and post-tests were identification tasks. An ANCOVA comparing the pre- and post-test identification accuracy revealed that the experimental group improved significantly more than the control group. The modified durational input allows participants to re-weight their processing cues and attend to spectral differences.
pronunciation; L2 phonology; perception; vowel contrasts; EFL; high variability phonetic training; cue re-weighting
Qin Yuan, John Archibald. Modified Input Training and Cue Reweighting in Second Language Vowel Perception. Frontiers in Educational Research (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 6: 65-75. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2022.050613.
[1] Flege, J. E., Bohn, O., & Jang, S.Y. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437-470.
[2] Iverson, P., & Evans, B. G. (2009). Learning English vowels with different first language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(2), 866-877.
[3] Rato, A., Rauber S. A., Soares, L. P., & Lucas, L. R. (2014). Challenges in the perception and production of English front vowels by native speakers of European Portuguese. Diacrítica, 28(1), 141-159.
[4] Bohn, O. S., & Flege, J. E. (1990). Interlingual identification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied psycholinguistics, 11(3), 303-328.
[5] Bohn, O. S. (1995). Cross-language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.279-304). Baltimore: York Press.
[6] Jin, S.H., & Liu, C. (2014). Intelligibility of American English vowels and consonants spoken by international students in the United States. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(2), 583-596.
[7] Wang, X., and Munro, M. J. (1999). “The Perception of English Tense-Lax Vowel Pairs by Native Mandarin Speakers: The Effect of Training on Attention to Temporal and Spectral Cues,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Editors J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville, and A. Baily (San Francisco, CA: University of California, Berkeley), 125-129.
[8] Bradlow, A. R. (2008). Training non-native language sound patterns: Lessons from training Japanese adults on the English /r/–/l/ contrast. In J. G. Hansen Edwards, & Zampini, M. L. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 287- 308). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[9] Leung, K. K. W., Jongman, A, Wang, Y., & Sereno, J. A. (2016). Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English tense and lax vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(1), 45-58.
[10] Duanmu, S. (2007). The phonology of standard Chinese. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
[11] Hagiwara, R. (2005). Monophthongs and formant movement in north American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(3), 2037.
[12] Xu, T. Q. (2001). Foundations of linguistics: A course book. Beijing, China: Peking University Press.
[13] Flege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems.In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and Theoretical and methodological issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 229-273). Timonium, MD: York Press.
[14] Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In O. S. Bohn, & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In hour of James Emil Flege (pp. 13-34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[15] Flege, J. E. (2018). It’s input that matters most, not age. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(5), 919-920.
[16] Fullana, N., & Mora. J. C. (2009). Production and perception of voicing contrasts in English word-final obstruents: Assessing the effects of experience and starting age. In M. A. Watkins, A. S. Rauber, & B. O. Baptista (Eds.), Recent research in second language phonetics/phonology: Perception and production (pp.97-117). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
[17] Logan, J. S., & Pruitt, J. S. (1995). Methodological issues in training listeners to perceive non-native phonemes. In W. Strange (Eds), Speech perception and Linguistic experience: Issues in cross language research (pp. 351-377). Timonium, MD: York Press.
[18] Aliaga-García, C., & Mora, J. C. (2009). Assessing the effects of phonetic training on L2 sound perception and production. In M. A. Watkins, S. R. Andrea, & B. O. Baptista (Eds.), Recent Research in second language phonetics/phonology: perception and production (pp. 2-31). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
[19] Rato, A. (2014). Effects of perceptual training on the identification of English vowels by native speakers of European Portuguese. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 529-546.
[20] Ylinen, S., Uther, M., Latvala A., Vepsäläinen, S., Iverson, P., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Näätänen, R. (2010). Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: A study of Finnish second-language users of English. Journal of Cognitive Neroscience, 22(6), 1319-1332.
[21] Iverson, P., Pinet, M. & Evans, B. G. (2012). Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(1), 145-160.
[22] Thomson, R. I. (2012). Improving L2 listeners’ perception of English vowels: A Computer-Mediated approach. Language Learning, 62(4), 1231-1258.
[23] Hillenbrand, J. M., Clark, M. J., & Houde, R. A. (2000). Some effects of duration on vowel recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108(6), 3013-3022.
[24] Sun, Y. H. (2006). Effects of language training on mandarin learners’ perception of America tense vowel /i/ and lax /ɪ/. Unpublished master’s thesis. Xinjiang, China: Xinjiang Normal University.
[25] Cebrian, J. (2006). Experience and the use of non-native duration in L2 vowel categorization. Journal of Phonetics, 34(3), 371-387.
[26] Grenon, I., Kubota, M., & Sheppard, C. (2019). The creation of a new vowel category by adult learners after adaptive phonetic training. Journal of Phonetics, 72, 17-34.
[27] Shinohara, Y., & Iverson, P. (2018). High variability identification and discrimination training for Japanese speakers learning English /r/-/l/. Journal of Phonetics, 66, 242-251.
[28] Grenon, I., Sheppard, C., & Archibald, J. (2019). The effect of discrimination training on Japanese listeners’ perception of the English coda consonants as in ‘rose’ and ‘roads’. In J. Levis, C. Nagle, & E. Tobey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 127-136). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
[29] Cheng, B., Zhang, X. J., Fan S.Y., & Zhang, Y. (2019). The role of temporal acoustic exaggeration in high variability phonetic training: A behavioral and ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10,1-15.
[30] Jiang, Y. Y. (2010). A study of American English vowels on English learners from Min and Wu dialects. Foreign Languages Research, 4, 36-40.
[31] Zhang, Z. Z. (2011). Phonetic contrast between Cantonese and Spanish. Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, 22(3), 97-112.
[32] Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.43).
[33] Styler, W. (2017). Using Praat for linguistic research. Retrived from http://wstyler.ucsd.edu/praat// UsingPraatforLinguisticResearchLatest.pdf
[34] Toivonen, I., Blumenfeld, L., Gormley, A., Hoiting, L., Logan, J., Ramlakhan, N., & Stone, A. (2015). Vowel height and duration. Proceedings of the 32nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Steindl, U. et al. (Eds.) (pp. 64-71). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
[35] Huang, L.S. (2010). Do different modalities of reflection matter? An exploration of adult second-language learners’ reported strategy use and oral language production. System, 38(2), 245-261.
[36] Phillips, C., Pellathy, T., Marantz, A., Yellin, E., Wexler, K., Poeppel, D., McGinnis,M., & Roberts, T. (2000). Auditory cortex accesses phonological categories: an MEG mismatch study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(6), 1038-1055.
[37] Logan, J.S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: A first report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874-886.
[38] Hardison, D. M. (2003). Acquisition of second-language speech: Effects of visualcues, context, and talker variability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(4), 495-522.
[39] Aron, A, Elaine N. Aron & Coups, E. (2006). Statistics for psychology. Beijing, China: World Publishing Corporation.
[40] Hu, W., Mi, L., Yang, Z., Tao, S., Li, M. S., Wang, W. J., Dong, Q., & Liu, C. (2016). Shifting perceptual weights in L2 vowel identification after training. PloS one 11(9), 1-14.