Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2022, 5(7); doi: 10.25236/FER.2022.050711.

Effect of Different Memorization Methods of Chinese Characters among Beginner-level Middle School Students in Australia

Author(s)

Jia Guo1, Tong Lin2, Yin Zhang2, Liping Feng1

Corresponding Author:
Liping Feng
Affiliation(s)

1Chinese Language & Culture College, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China

2Richmond High School, Melbourne, 3121, Australia

Abstract

We conducted a one-year longitudinal study of middle school beginner Chinese learners in Australia about how they memorize Chinese characters to figure out the effect of different memorization methods. Based on the test, questionnaire and interview, we found: The effect of memorization method is relatively stable in different memory stages. Form-pronuciation-meaning associative mnemonics, Stroke mnemonics and Characters-associative mnemonics have the better effect of all the memorizing stages. Different memorization methods cause different type of errors. The method of repetitive practice mainly cause stroke missing while Characters-associative mnemonics mainly lead to the confusion in strokes between characters. The main reason for the poor performance of Components-associative mnemonics is the stroke errors in the inner component. Therefore, the teaching suggestion is proposed: Teachers should guide students to make good use of Components-associative mnemonics, pay attention to the effectiveness of Stroke mnemonics and the diversity of memorization methods.

Keywords

Chinese character mnemonics; memory effects; error analysis; beginner-level Chinese learners; middle school students in Australia

Cite This Paper

Jia Guo, Tong Lin, Yin Zhang, Liping Feng. Effect of Different Memorization Methods of Chinese Characters among Beginner-level Middle School Students in Australia. Frontiers in Educational Research (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 7: 51-62. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2022.050711.

References

[1] Chen Deyin, Yang Xuming. Corpus-based analysis of Thai students' Chinese writing error and teaching strategies [J]. Overseas Chinese Education, 2018(4): 41-49.

[2] Chen Qin, Liu Jing, Zhu Li. Analysis of Chinese writing error of Thai students [J]. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Teaching and Research on Chinese as a Foreign Language), 2009, 7(2): 76-82.

[3] Feng Liping, Guo Jia. A study of Chinese character memory methods and cues of Chinese beginners among middle school students in Australia [J]. Folk Classics Textual Research, 2018(2): 93-100

[4] Feng Liping. Cognitive Perspectives on Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2013.

[5] Feng Zhongliang, Wu Xinchun, Yao Meilin, Wang Jianmin. Educational psychology (2nd edition) [M]. Beijing: People's Education Press, 2010.

[6] Guo Shenglin. Stroke characteristics of Chinese characters and stroke error of foreign students[J]. Journal of College of Chinese Language and Culture of Jinan University, 2008 (4): 63-69.

[7] Jiang Xin, Zhao Guo. Research on the learning strategies of Chinese characters of foreign students in the early stage [J]. Language Teaching and Research, 2001 (4): 10-17.

[8] Liu Yanmei. Research on the effect of component strategy training in Chinese character teaching[J]. Language Teaching and Research, 2009 (2): 61-66.

[9] Ma Mingyan. Case study on the learning strategy of Chinese characters of international students from non-Chinese character circles in the early stage[J]. Chinese Teaching in the World,2007(1):40-49.

[10] Shi Zhengyu. An analysis of Chinese character writing errors of international students [J]. Chinese Language Learning, 2000 (2): 38-41.

[11] Wang Ning. An introduction to the study of Chinese character formation theory [M]. Beijing: Commercial Press, 2015.

[12] Xiao Xiqiang. Analysis of Chinese character errors of foreign students[J]. Chinese Teaching in the World, 2002 (2): 79-85.

[13] Zhang Jun. The construction of writing behavioral errors system of international students[J]. Overseas Chinese Education, 2015 (2): 269-275.

[14] Zhang Pengpeng. Three Sinogram Verses Using Radicals. [M]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press, 2006.

[15] Zhang Yuan. A study on the memory strategy of Chinese characters of elementary students[D]. Fudan University, 2011.

[16] Zhao Guo, Jiang Xin. What kind of Chinese character learning strategy is most effective? --A Survey and Research on International Students in the Basic Stage [J]. Applied Linguistics, 2002 (2): 79-85.

[17] Zhou Jian, Yu Wanchuan. Research on learning strategies to improve the teaching of Chinese characters [J]. Journal of College of Chinese Language and Culture of Jinan University, 2004 (1): 1-9.

[18] Zhu Zhiping, Harina. Study, analysis and reflection on the acquisition of Chinese characters by Polish students and European and American students [J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Science Edition), 1999 (6): 88-94.

[19] Ke C. Effects of strategies on the learning of Chinese characters among foreign language students[J]. JOURNAL-CHINESE LANGUAGE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, 1998, 33: 93-111.

[20] Van Geert P, Van Dijk M. Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. [J]. Infant Behavior & Development, 2002, 25(4): 340-374.