This paper focuses on the content and characteristics of HSK CET-6 writing through the method of literature and example analysis. In addition. It summarizes the errors of CET-6 writing and puts forward some learning strategies, In addition, it summarizes the errors of CET-6 writing and puts forward some learning strategies. The purpose is to help the examinees prepare for CET-6 writing. This paper consists of seven parts. The first part is the introduction, which analyzes the background, significance, research content and methods of the the first part is the introduction, which analyzes the background, significance, research content and methods of the topic selection, as well as some literature of CET-6 writing, and makes a brief summary of the research status. The second part is a description of the HSK test, plus an overview of the CET-5 and CET-6 writing types. The third part is mainly through the collection of real questions, and the examples to analyze The third part is mainly through the collection of real questions, and the examples to analyze the three question types of the CET-5 writing, and the focus is on level 6 abbreviation and its examination sites, content, etc. Meanwhile, it gets a change. Meanwhile, it gets a change in writing between the six level and the five level. This is an integrated upgrade to level 5. Both of them have something in common, but there are also great differences, candidates need to grasp these similarities and differences, timely to adjust their own learning plan. The fourth part is an overview of writing errors in CET-6 on the basis of summarizing the previous research results: It is found that the errors are mainly divided into six categories: Chinese characters, words, discourse, grammar, format and punctuation, aiming to make students and teachers better understand the errors, their The fifth and sixth parts are some learning strategies and teaching The last part is a summary of the full text, combing the conclusions and so on. The last part is a summary of the full text, combing the conclusions and so on.

Yuan Jinghan. A Comparative Study of HSK 5 and HSK6 Writing Based on the Test-taking Objectives. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 6: 6-17. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2022.050602.

[1] Huang B. R., Liao X. D.. Modern Chinese [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2017.

[2] Guo, Oriole. Analysis of HSK writing bias and teaching research based on abbreviated corpus [D]. Lanzhou University,2018.

[3] Song Haiyan. Analysis of bias in writing questions and teaching suggestions of Chinese Proficiency Test (New HSK Level 6) [D]. Fujian Normal University,2019.

[4] Lu Jianji. Analysis of grammatical biases of foreigners learning Chinese[J]. Language Teaching and Research, 1994(01):55-60.