Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2022, 5(6); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2022.050605.

Contradiction and evolution analysis of social power structure in rural China


Cao Letian

Corresponding Author:
Cao Letian

School of Public Administration, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China


Based on Zhang Jing's research on grassroots political power, this paper analyzes the evolution of the relationship between grassroots society and local authority. This paper summarizes the evolution of power structure in rural society, and summarizes the characteristics of governance and its evolution of Rural Chinese Society from ancient times to the present. Synthesizing the academic research of Various Chinese scholars, the author proposes paths and solutions to solve the dilemma of local society and local government.


Chinese Rural Society; Squire; Grassroots regimes; Rural governance

Cite This Paper

Cao Letian. Contradiction and evolution analysis of social power structure in rural China. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 6: 30-33. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2022.050605.


[1] Li Lianjiang, Zhang Jing, Liu Shouying & Ying Xing. (2018). -- Li Lianjiang, Zhang Jing, Liu Shouying and Ying Xing. The Social Sciences Evaluation of China (03), 5-11.

[2] Wang Xianming. (2009). -- The institutional changes, revolutionary discourse and gentry power in the early 20th century. Nankai Journal (Philosophy and Social Sciences edition) (01), 95-107. 

[3] Zhongguo, F. X. X., Hamilton, G. G., & Zheng, W. (1992). From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society (1st ed.). University of California Press. 

[4] He Xuefeng. (2011). -- takes the survey of K Town in Henan Province as an example. The Open Era (02), 86-101.

[5] Xu Yong. (2007). "Political party to the countryside": the integration of the modern country to the countryside. Academic Monthly (08), 13-20.

[6] Yan Delu. (2016). Promote rural governance in contemporary China with new villagers. Theory Discussion (01), 17-21. doi:10.16354/j.cnki.23-1013/d.2016.01. 003.