Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of New Developments in Education, 2022, 4(6); doi: 10.25236/IJNDE.2022.040604.

The instructive implications of Hong Kong higher education for mainland China education


Yiyin Li

Corresponding Author:
Yiyin Li

The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China


The aim of this study is to analyse the successful experience of higher education in Hong Kong and to propose recommendations and strategies to promote higher education in mainland China. Secondly, to provide an overview of the experience and development patterns of Hong Kong's higher education institutions and to provide an effective theoretical framework for university education in the mainland. This study will be a quantitative study with data collection and analysis by means of an online questionnaire. Fifty teachers from a university in Hong Kong will participate in the questionnaire exercise. The study found that universities in Hong Kong place more emphasis on formative assessment, but as this is an ongoing process, not every teacher is able to give feedback. However, in contrast to SA, FA is more conducive to developing students' learning skills.


Higher Education; Hong Kong; Mainland China

Cite This Paper

Yiyin Li. The instructive implications of Hong Kong higher education for mainland China education. International Journal of New Developments in Education (2022) Vol. 4, Issue 6: 19-25. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2022.040604.


[1] Bevitt, S. (2015, 2015/01/02). Assessment innovation and student experience: a new assessment challenge and call for a multi-perspective approach to assessment research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.890170

[2] Gibbs, G. (2006). How assessment frames student learning. Innovative assessment in higher education, 23.

[3] Bryan, C., & Clegg, K. (2019). Innovative assessment in higher education: A handbook for academic practitioners. Routledge.

[4] Joughin, G. (2009). Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education: A Critical Review. In G. Joughin (Ed.), Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education (pp. 1-15). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8905-3_2

[5] Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. Routledge. 

[6] Kirkpatrick, R., & Zang, Y. (2011, 2011/10/15). The Negative Influences of Exam-Oriented Education on Chinese High School Students: Backwash from Classroom to Child. Language Testing in Asia, 1(3), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-1-3-36 

[7] Ro, J. (2019, 2019/01/01). Learning to teach in the era of test-based accountability: a review of research. Professional Development in Education, 45(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941 5257.2018.1514525

[8] Yao, L. (2015). A Butterfly Effect in Universities: From Pursuing the Rate of Attending Exams for Entrance to Graduate Education to Overflow of Exam-oriented Education. Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation, 43-47.

[9] Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), e3292. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.1002/rev3.3292 

[10] Salas Vicente, F., Escuder, Á. V., Pérez Puig, M. Á., & Segovia López, F. (2021). Effect on Procrastination and Learning of Mistakes in the Design of the Formative and Summative Assessments: A Case Study. Education Sciences, 11(8), 428. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/8/428 

[11] Adarkwah, M. A. (2021, 2021/03/09). The power of assessment feedback in teaching and learning: a narrative review and synthesis of the literature. SN Social Sciences, 1(3), 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021- 00086-w

[12] Koenka, A. C. (2022, 2022/01/02). Grade expectations: the motivational consequences of performance feedback on a summative assessment. The Journal of Experimental Education, 90(1), 88-111. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00220973.2020.1777069 

[13] Sadler, D. R. (1998, 1998/03/01). Formative Assessment: revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050104 

[14] Darr, A., Regan, J., & Berrocal, Y. (2021, 2021/12/01). Effect of Video Conferencing on Student Academic Performance: Evidence from Preclinical Summative Assessment Scores. Medical Science Educator, 31(6), 1747-1750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01378-9

[15] Wong, Y.-L. (2022). Student Alienation in Higher Education Under Neoliberalism and Global Capitalism: A Case of Community College Students’ Instrumentalism in Hong Kong. Community College Review, 50(1), 96-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521211047680 

[16] Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2021, 2021/03/01/). Assessment for learning in the Hong Kong assessment reform: A case of policy borrowing. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100985. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100985 

[17] Hounsell, D. (2021). Feedback in Postgraduate Online Learning: Perspectives and Practices. In T. Fawns, G. Aitken, & D. Jones (Eds.), Online Postgraduate Education in a Postdigital World: Beyond Technology (pp. 39-62). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77673-2_3

[18] Sambell, K., Gibson, M., & Cetl, C. (2007, 07/01). Rethinking Feedback: an Assessment for Learning perspective.