Zihan Lin, Rongping Cao
School of Foreign Language, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
In response to environmental issues around the world, the United Nation and the Chinese NGO have launched various proposals and policies focusing on the relationships between humans and nature. From the perspective of conceptual metaphor, this study analyses the UN Protected Planet Report 2020, and China Environment Yearbook, edited by the first Chinese environmental NGO, Under the theory of Conceptual Metaphor by Lakoff and Johnson, a corpus-based methodology combining qualitative and quantitative approaches was applied to demonstrate traits of metaphors used in the reports to illustrate the conceptual models in ecological discourses in Chinese and English. This article figured out that conflict, journey, and living organism metaphor can best reflect different ideologies between parallel discourses in the two cultures. It helps to identify characteristics of language use of metaphor in Chinese and English ecological discourses.
Conceptual Metaphor, Corpus Linguistics, Wmatrix
Zihan Lin, Rongping Cao. A Corpus-Based Study on Metaphor in Ecological Discourses. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 8: 97-103. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2022.050816.
 Chaeteris-Black, J. (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis [M]. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
 Cameron, L. & Maslen, R. (2010) Metaphor Analysis [M], London: Equinox.
 Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and social change [M]. Cambridge: Polity Press.
 Fill, A., & Mühlhäusler, P. (Eds.). (2001) Ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment [M]. London: Continuum.
 Gong, H. (2019) A corpus-based critical ecological discourse analysis of corporate annual environmental reports: China Three Gorges Corporation as an example [D].
 Huang, G. (2018) From eco-critical discourse analysis to harmonious discourse analysis [J]. Foreign Languages in China.
 Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. (1980/2003) Metaphors we live by [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
 Lakoff, G., et.al. (1989/1991. Master Metaphor List [M]. University of California at Berkeley.
 Li, S. (2019) A comparative study of ecological metaphors in the economic keynote speeches of Chinese, American and Russian leaders. (MA thesis, Xi’an International Studies University)
 Liu, C & Liu, S. (2019) The ethical norms of ecological discourse analysis: on the pros and cons of anthropocentrism [J]. Foreign Languages in China.
 Pragglejaz Group. (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse [J]. Metaphor and Symbol, (1), 1-39.
 Rayson, P. (2008) From keywords to key semantic domains [J]. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (4), 519-549
 Richards, I. A., & Constable, J. (2018) The philosophy of rhetoric. Routledge.
 Moghadam Saneie, M., & Samar Ghafar, R. (2020) Metaphor in second language academic writing. Language awareness, 29(3-4), 255-271.
 Stibbe, A. (2015) Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by [M]. London: Routledge.
 Sun, Y. (2012) Metaphor research based on the corpus tool Wmatrix [J]. Foreign Language Education.
 Sun, Y. (2013) A probe into the metaphor identification technique based on semantic domain: with Wmatrix corpus Linguistic Program as an example [J]. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages.
 Yu, D. (2020) Corporate Environmentalism: A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Chinese, American, and Italian Corporate Social Responsibility Reports. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(3), 244-258.