Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Medical Science Research, 2019, 1(2); doi: 10.25236/FMSR.20190201.

In silico analysis on structure and DNA binding mode of AtNF -YB8 in Arabidopsis thaliana L

Author(s)

Jubaili Norah Ahmed H*, Liang-jianLi, Rui Hu, Wan-Jun wang

Corresponding Author:
Jubaili Norah Ahmed H
Affiliation(s)

School of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
*Corresponding Author

Abstract

Nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) is a heterotrimeric, DNA-binding transcription factor (TF) that is conserved in all eukaryotes, which consists of three subunits, NF-YA, NF-YB, and NF-YC, and binds to the CCAAT box in the promoter regions of its target genes to regulate their expression. AtNF-YB8, a transcription factor from Arabidopsis thaliana, plays an important role in many biological processes in plants. In order to understand the structure and DNA binding model of AtNF-YB8, the 3D structure model of AtNF-YB8 was constructed and docked with the eleven target DNA. Also, the decomposition of the binding energy on a per-residue basis in the AtNF-YB8/DNA07 complex by MD simulations showed that the residues Lys-34, Lys-96, Lys-101 and Lys-110 were probably for specific recognition of DNA.

Keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana, AtNF-YB8, DNA binding, Molecular modeling, Molecular dynamics, Transcription factor

Cite This Paper

Jubaili Norah Ahmed H, Liang-jianLi, Rui Hu, Wan-Jun wang. In silico analysis on structure and DNA binding  mode of AtNF -YB8 in Arabidopsis thaliana L. Frontiers in Medical Science Research (2019) Vol. 1 Issue 2: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.25236/FMSR.20190201.

References

[1]A.J. Warren(2002) . Eukaryotic transcription factors, Current opinion in structural biology, no.12,pp.107-114.
[2]G. Stampfel, T. Kazmar, O. Frank, S. et al(2015) , Transcriptional regulators form diverse groups with context-dependent regulatory functions, Nature, vol, 528, no.7580, 147-151.
[3]G. Li, H. Zhao, L. Wang, Y. Wang, et al(2018), The animal nuclear factor Y: an enigmatic and important heterotrimeric transcription factor, American journal of cancer research, no. 8, pp.1106-1125.
[4]T. Laloum, S. De Mita, P. Gamas, et al(2013). CCAAT-box binding transcription factors in plants: Y so many?, Trends in plant science, no. 18, pp.157-166.
[5]R.D. Welch, C. Guo, M. Sengupta, et al(2017). Rev-Erb co-regulates muscle regeneration via tethered interaction with the NF-Y cistrome, Molecular metabolism, no.6, pp.703-714.
[6]G. Begum, M. Otsu, U. Ahmed, Z. et, al(2018). NF-Y-dependent regulation of glutamate receptor 4 expression and cell survival in cells of the oligodendrocyte lineage, Glia,no. 66, pp.1896-1914.
[7]A. Dorn, J. Bollekens, A. Staub, et al(1987), A multiplicity of CCAAT box-binding proteins, Cell, no. 50, pp. 863-872.
[8]M. Morey, S.K. Yee, T. Herman,et al(2008). Coordinate control of synaptic-layer specificity and rhodopsins in photoreceptor neurons, Nature, no. 456, pp.795-799.
[9]M. Nardini, N. Gnesutta, G. Donati, et al(2013). A. Fossati, C. Vonrhein, D. Moras, C. Romier, M. Bolognesi, R. Mantovani, Sequence-specific transcription factor NF-Y displays histone-like DNA binding and H2B-like ubiquitination, Cell , no.152, pp. 132-143.
[10]H. Zhao, D. Wu, F. Kong, et al(2016). The Arabidopsis thaliana Nuclear Factor Y Transcription Factors, Frontiers in plant science , no.7, pp.2045.
[11]Sinha S , Maity S N , Lu J , et al(1995). Recombinant rat CBF-C, the third subunit of CBF/NFY, allows formation of a protein-DNA complex with CBF-A and CBF-B and with yeast HAP2 and HAP3.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 92, no.5, pp.1624-1628.
[12]S. Sinha, I.S. Kim, K.Y. Sohn,et al(1996). Three classes of mutations in the A subunit of the CCAAT-binding factor CBF delineate functional domains involved in the three-step assembly of the CBF-DNA complex, Molecular and cellular biology , no.16, pp.328-337.
[13]V. Calvenzani, B. Testoni, G. Gusmaroli, et al(2012). Interactions and CCAAT-binding of Arabidopsis thaliana NF-Y subunits, PloS one, no. 7, pp.42902.
[14]C. Ren, Z. Zhang, Y. Wang, et al(2016), Genome-wide identification and characterization of the NF-Y gene family in grape (vitis vinifera L.), BMC genomics , no.17, pp.605.
[15]R. Hooft van Huijsduijnen, X.Y. Li, D. Black, et al. Co-evolution from yeast to mouse: cDNA cloning of the two NF-Y (CP-1/CBF) subunits, The EMBO journal, no. 9, pp.3119-3127.
[16]X.Y. Li, R. Mantovani, R. Hooft van Huijsduijnen,et al(1992), C. Benoist, D. Mathis, Evolutionary variation of the CCAAT-binding transcription factor NF-Y, Nucleic acids research, no. 20, pp.1087-1091.
[17]R. Mantovani(1999), The molecular biology of the CCAAT-binding factor NF-Y, Gene, no. 239, pp. 15-27.
[18]Coustry F , Maity S N , De Crombrugghe B(1995) . Studies on Transcription Activation by the Multimeric CCAAT-binding Factor CBF. Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol.270, no.1, pp.468-475.
[19]A. de Silvio, C. Imbriano, R. Mantovani(1999). Dissection of the NF-Y transcriptional activation potential, Nucleic acids research, vol.27, no.13, 2578-2584.
[20]G. Arents, E.N. Moudrianakis(1995), The histone fold: a ubiquitous architectural motif utilized in DNA compaction and protein dimerization, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , vol.92, no.24, pp.11170-11174.
[21]A.D. Baxevanis, G. Arents, E.N. Moudrianakis, et al(1995), A variety of DNA-binding and multimeric proteins contain the histone fold motif, Nucleic acids research, vol. 23, no.14, pp.2685-2691.
[22]Luger K , Mader A W , Richmond R K , et al(1997). Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature, vol.389, no.6648, pp.251-260.
[23]P. Bucher(1990). Weight matrix descriptions of four eukaryotic RNA polymerase II promoter elements derived from 502 unrelated promoter sequences, Journal of molecular biology, vol.212, no.4, pp.563-578.
[24]R. Mantovani(1998). A survey of 178 NF-Y binding CCAAT boxes, Nucleic acids research vol.26, no.5, pp.1135-1143.
[25]Wei Q , Ma C , Xu Y , et al(2017). Control of chrysanthemum flowering through integration with an aging pathway. Nature Communications, vol.8, no.1, pp.829.
[26]Lloyd J P , Seddon A E , Moghe G D , et al(2015). Characteristics of Plant Essential Genes Allow for within- and between-Species Prediction of Lethal Mutant Phenotypes. The Plant Cell, vol.27, no.8, pp.2133-2147.
[27]Khan A , Oriol Fornés, Stigliani A , et al(2017). JASPAR 2018: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles and its web framework. Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 77, no.21, pp.43.
[28]R.A. Laskowski, M.W. MacArthur, D.S. Moss,et al(1993). PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures., J Appl Crysth, vol,26 no.2, pp. 283-291.
[29]M.J. Lajoie, S. Kosuri, J.A. Mosberg, et al(2013), Probing the limits of genetic recoding in essential genes, Science, vol.342, no.6156, pp. 361-363.
[30]Y.N. Ye, B.G. Ma, C. Dong, et al(2016), A novel proposal of a simplified bacterial gene set and the neo-construction of a general minimized metabolic network, Sci Rep, no.6, pp. 35082.
[31]H. Luo, Y. Lin, F. Gao,et al(2014). DEG 10, an update of the database of essential genes that includes both protein-coding genes and noncoding genomic elements, Nucleic Acids Res, no. 42, pp. D574-580.
[32]W.H. Chen, G. Lu, X. Chen, et al(2017), OGEE v2: an update of the online gene essentiality database with special focus on differentially essential genes in human cancer cell lines, Nucleic Acids Res, no. 45, pp.D940-D944.