“The Birthmark” is a short science fiction created by Nathaniel Hawthorne in 1843. The story tells of an eighteenth-century scientist who attempts to remove his wife’s birthmark yet takes her life in the end. This paper will use Louis Montrose’s theory of Historicity of Texts and the Textuality of History to disclose the dialogic relationship between “The Birthmark” and its historical context and Hawthorne’s view of science. This paper firstly discusses the historical background of the industrial age reflected in the story and then analyzes Hawthorne’s interpretation of the industrial revolution through the alienation of man. It later explores the American Transnationalism’s influence on the creation of the text and finally examines the importance of Neo-Humanism shown in Hawthorne’s work. This paper aims to prove that “The Birthmark” is the production of its distinctive historical contexts, and it exerts a crucial influence on the historical context. Furthermore, the Neo-Humanism implied by Hawthorne in “The Birthmark”, the embodiment of both science and humanity, sheds light on the development of modern society.

Yin Zifan. A New Historicist Approach to Hawthorne’s View of Science in “The Birthmark”. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 10: 107-111. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2022.051017.

[1] Edward H. Rosenberry, “Hawthorne's Allegory of Science: ‘Rappaccini's Daughter,’” American Literature, Vol.32, No.4, 1960, p.42.

[2] Howard Bruce Franklin, Future Perfect: American Science Fiction of the Nineteenth Century: An Anthology, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1995, p. 17.

[3] Henry G. Fairbanks, “Hawthorne and the Machine Age,” American Literature, Vol.28, No.2, 1956, p.163.

[4] Chiyo Yoshii, “Humanity as Matter: Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Vivacious Materialism in ‘The Birth-mark’ and ‘Rappaccini’s Daughter’,” Literary Imagination, Vol.22, No.3, 2020, p. 226.

[5] Charles E. Bressler, Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice, New Jersey: Prentice Hall College Div, 1994.

[6] Louis A. Montrose, “Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture,” in Harold Aram Veeser (Ed.), The New Historicism, (New York: Routledge, 2013), p. 20.

[7] Leland S. Person, The Cambridge Introduction to Nathaniel Hawthorne, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 16.

[8] Nathaniel Hawthorne, “The Birthmark,” In Huang Pei (Ed.), 101 Classical Short Stories, Tianjin: Tianjin Renmin Print, 2019.

[9] Nathaniel Hawthorne, The Letter, 1813-1843, Ed. William Charvat et al., Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1984, p. 330.

[10] Jane Tompkins, Sensational Designs: The Cultural Work of American Fiction, 1790-1860, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986, p. 19.

[11] Peter Rietbergen, Europe: A Cultural History, London and New York: Routledge, 1998, p. 318.

[12] Yangjie Liao, The Acception, Suspicion and Transcendence of Hawthorne to Transcendentalism, Xiangtan University, MA thesis, 2006, p. 14.

[13] Henry David Thoreau, Walden, New York: Cosimo Classics, 2009, p. 36.

[14] Emory Elliott, The Columbia Literary History of the United States, New York: Columbia University Press, 1988, p. 413.

[15] Herman Melville, “Hawthorne and His Mosses,” in J. Donald Crowley (Ed.), The Critical Heritage: Nathaniel Hawthorne, London and New York: Routledge, 2002. p. 114.

[16] Shaopin Gan, “The Inspirations form the Neo-Humanism,” Philosophical Research, No. 06, 2011, p.68.