Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2022, 5(10); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2022.051020.

New Thinking on the Performance Evaluation of Government Civil Servants in the New Era

Author(s)

Ge Zhang

Corresponding Author:
Ge Zhang
Affiliation(s)

Northwest University of Political Science and Law, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710063, China

Abstract

The fourth Plenary Session of the 19th CPC Central Committee highlighted the reform goal of "building a service-oriented government that the people are satisfied with". Governments at all levels also constantly improve the efficiency of government work by streamlining administration, delegating power and strengthening the combination of regulation, and promote the modernization of national governance system and governance capacity. As the main body of the functions of our government, government officials play an important role in the process of building a service-oriented government that the people are satisfied with and promoting the modernization of government governance capacity. Therefore, it is a very necessary choice to carry out the performance evaluation practice for civil servants. Although valued, but for a long time our country government in the human resource management practice experience guidance and accumulation of government performance management and evaluation practice experience, although contribute to the improvement of performance and efficiency, but there are still many shortcomings, this paper points out that the new era of government civil servants performance evaluation content and way of problems to put forward the solution strategy.

Keywords

government departments, public servants, performance evaluation

Cite This Paper

Ge Zhang. New Thinking on the Performance Evaluation of Government Civil Servants in the New Era. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 10: 122-126. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2022.051020.

References

[1] Ruan Qi. The game and its influence in government performance evaluation [J].China Collective Economy, 2017 (29):27-28.

[2] Wang Zhili. Exploration on the value orientation of civil servant performance evaluation under the new normal [J]. Inner Mongolia Coal Economy, 2017(18):67+83.

[3] Shen Xilian, Zhong Min. Government performance evaluation--based on enterprise performance evaluation based on the perspective of service-based government [J]. the Journal of Yunnan Administration College, 2020, 22(02):159-16

[4] Zhang Honghai. Research on public sector performance management and evaluation [J]. tribune of Social Sciences, 2014 (01):213-217.

[5] Deng Guosheng. Innovation of official assessment content and assessment method [J]. Chinese Cadres Tribune, 2017 (01):12-15.

[6] Yan Haina. How well does the government performance appraisal do? The -- is based on the perspective of the public employee perception [J]. Administrative Tribune, 2017, 24(04):108-117.

[7] Xu Yang. The dilemma of "formalism" and the improvement path in the Performance Evaluation of the Government Vertical Management Department-Empirical analysis based on 3 typical cases [J]. Leadership Science, 2017(20):16-18.

[8] Zhong Lifeng. Several basic problems of performance management [J]. Nankai Business Review, 2002( 5) : 15-19.

[9] Xu Hui. Performance improvement and management model innovation based on big data [J]. China Soft Science, 2017(01):50-58.

[10] Li Hui. Research on the Use of Government Performance Evaluation Results in China [J]. Journal of Shandong Academy of Governance, 2008(04):22-24.

[11] Liu Junke. Significance, problems and countermeasures of government performance evaluation [J]. The Friend of the Head (Financial Observation), 2008(09):106-107.